u/dblohm7
dblohm7
dblohm7
That doesn’t mean it works the same on mobile. GeckoView works a lot differently than the desktop editions of Gecko.
(That’s also why Fission is not yet enabled by default on mobile: it needs to do a lot more complicated stuff to manage resources)
And that’s also why about:config is hidden on Android release builds: we knew that people would assume that everything works identically on Android as it does on desktop, when that is in fact false.
dblohm7
Use at your own risk!
While in there, be sure to set to true as well, privacy.firstparty.isolate , privacy.resist.fingerprinting and privacy.fingerprintingProtection ! Too bad there is no about:config that opens up in regular mobile Firefox, this change will need to be folded in.
Those are not tested at all.
dblohm7
Not currently, no.
dblohm7
It’s a huge improvement. The parent Firefox process will use more memory, but by and large users should not notice any performance difference versus disabled.
(I worked on the old implementation)
dblohm7
The closed system also has zero effect on crime
dblohm7
You need to understand that customizing your UI with CSS is an unsupported feature. By “unsupported,” it means that there is no guarantee that the underlying structure of the UI won’t change from one version to the next.
Nobody warns you because it should simply be expected.
dblohm7
No, it doesn’t do that. It’s only running as long as you have any Firefox windows open.
dblohm7
What do you mean? Desktop applications don’t stop running every time they become inactive.
dblohm7
Are you sure it’s SpiderMonkey? Are you running tests against the standalone interpreter, or are you running them in the browser?
If it’s the latter, keep in mind that there are probably other browser components involved. But as mentioned elsewhere, performance profiles are the way to find out.
dblohm7
Read the comments elsewhere on this thread. Statcounter is a tracker. Firefox blocks trackers. Do the math.
dblohm7
Mobile.
dblohm7
Lol
dblohm7
Are there any policy settings your registry?
dblohm7
That option can be hidden by policy settings in the registry.
dblohm7
Quite often on this sub I see people changing their page file settings from the default (which is to let the OS automatically adjust the page file size) over to letting them specify an arbitrary maximum size for the page file.
Because of the way Windows works, changing this setting is actually a terrible idea.
dblohm7
Yes. It’s best to just let Windows manage it, tbh.
dblohm7
Your page file is nearly full. Did you change your settings to manually manage it?
dblohm7
I’m not sure that you’re going to get the answers you’re seeking on Reddit; this is not an official forum.
You’d probably be better off discussing this directly with the WebExtensions team on Matrix.
dblohm7
dblohm7
You definitely do not want to do that.
dblohm7
Now just imagine that little shit as a lawyer! 🤮
dblohm7
I’m listening…
dblohm7
Yeah, that sounds right to me. (OP, this would be more appropriate for r/Tailscale than this sub).
HTTP2 and HTTP3 are always HTTPS.