u/glugamesh

Have you ever seen how sports works? There's a reason they have tiers that are designated as Under 4, Under 5, under 8 or whatever. Sometimes kids come into the sport and are very good and can steamroll the other kids. It's fine when they're in their teens and playing more competitively but if the other kids can't play then it's not fair to them either.

It wasn't his game to play, he was moved to a higher tier because he was better. The parents ignored this and decided to bring him to the game anyways and start shit with the other parents traumatizing their kid in the process.

Best I could find https://youtu.be/5UcUA4pzA7s

I suppose the intent is to show that cats are of the devil and that because Islamists are comfortable with cats that they are in league with the devil? First 2 are AI, last one may not be. Cats don't freak out like that in those situations.

You take a length that's longer than you need. You solder the start of the wire to your first point of connection. You take the wire and bend it in the location you want, solder that point. Repeat as needed until you reach the end point where you solder it there too, clipping the excess. It's something that takes about 30 seconds to about a minute and a half per wire and no helping hands needed.

I mean, if you prefer the aesthetic of the copper sheet, keep doing it. But if you ever have a deadline of any sort, I would use a wire.

Like others are saying, wire might be better. That said, there used to be a chinese board manufacturer named MeasureExplorer that had something similar to the perfboard here but there were small traces in between each hole that you would scribe away, similar to stripboard but in both directions. It was probably still more effort than a wire but far less than trying to cut and solder copper sheet to the board.

Millwoods is actually way better than it used to be. It's actually a pretty good place.

Not directly an AI image, maybe made with Canva laid out with AI tools.

Car is consistent from shot to shot, just a shitty tofu dreg wall which is common. Not AI

There are a lot of jobs that people describe as soul crushing and something nobody should be subjected to like data entry, call center work or other menial office tasks. Now those jobs are going away, jobs people hated and now people lament their loss. I get it, those were income for people but isn't that the point of automation?

I might be in the minority but I'm going to say No. It's not AI. Looks like illustration to me and the decisions made seem like human ones.

To be fair, these AI companies are playing musical chairs with huge amounts of debt far exceeding even many years of actual revenue. There is going to be a shake-up when the music stops and it's going to suck. But, like we've been saying for a long time, it doesn't mean the tech goes away or that they're going to pack it up and things will go back the way they were.

It might be intended to be drilled from outside and then plugged later but I'm willing to bet it's a new engineer because drawing something like that is intentional.

To be fair though, many of these infills just try to maximize density without any consideration for what's around it or the services in the area. Not to mention that the city is trying to do away with street parking little by little while increasing density.

I have as high minded ideals about this stuff as anyone else but having rode around town in these neighborhoods, I can see why people are pissed off about living in a neighborhood with bungalows and then these 5 story obelisks pop up with insufficient sewer, waste or traffic service.

Danielle Smith is certainly making hay with a small patch of discontentment but I don't think it's *just* NIMBY or invented issues.

Not AI. Videos like that, or this one in particular, are old as dirt. Jellyfish are basically 98% water.

The metal is warped. What I used to do is, if the metal is thin enough, place the pot upside down and hit it in the center with a malette until it bows inwards. It will change the way it contacts on a glass top oven but it won't spin and rock.

If he drank from other sources before, it's probable that he'll go back to them if you stop giving him water from the tap. But you have to be diligent.

It's good enough. You use epoxy to bind it, it's perfectly solid. It might be .01" out if you're sloppy but that's what the adjustment is for on the probe head. If you want it better you can put it in the lathe, grab it by the metal base and nudge it into place as the epoxy sets.

You have to anyways, even with a new stylus.

You can readjust the head to zero runout, you should even with new styli. And no, it's about the same, just lighter. The probe calibration takes care of some of the difference, if it's even more than .0002".

Get the carbon fibre ones and then you can cut it, drill out the stem, glue the ball back in with epoxy and be on your way again with a slightly shorter stylus.

Make a saddle shape for the pipe cutaway in surfaces, project an arc into it. Use that shape and use contour but 3D and set your depth to incremental. It will follow the curve and you can apply roughing, finding and lead in and lead out. To reduce the size of the gcode, use filter and make sure you allow z movements in arcs in your post.

Ask the AI why the responses are different (provide the statements) and you'll get a real answer. But I would guess you're not interested in that.

Is programming and swe economically worthless? I don't think so. The job has changed though. What's stopping those people from doing what they love?

That said, for some people, programming is tedious. I've programmed since I was 10, and I now just want to get a job done. I spent decades learning to program, 18 hour days sweating away in a small room building the stuff I loved. Now it's just tedious to me and AI helps bring my projects closer to fruition.

When computers were being introduced into industry back in the 70s and 80s, there was an actual slowdown in productivity. I think this is similar, most people don't know what to do with AI. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity_paradox