u/Abstrct
-
29points
-
13points
Anybody else notice Nova is broken? (i.redd.it)
-
13points
Schemaverse - The return of the SQL Space Battle (schemaverse.com) [Projects]
-
5points
Schemaverse - The SQL Space Battle (schemaverse.com) [PostgreSQL]
Abstrct
Abstrct
Surely a frog would appreciate a Toron Toad
Abstrct
Ya I’m an idiot. It was the cheapest Toronto domain I could find :(
Abstrct
I dunno, kinda worst game but funniest thing when they fell face first
Abstrct
Thanks for giving it a shot! I hope you enjoy the full set later too :D
Abstrct
In hindsight, Toronto.Ad is a terrible domain because it looks like I posted spam. I read it as Toron-toad in my head.
Abstrct
Associate is too long of a name, sorry :(
Abstrct
I’d love to hear which mini-game you loved and hated. Hopefully I timed this post so somebody could play it on their morning commute.
Abstrct
Yeah that’s fair. It exists, but it’s generally a product with a “Contact Us” on the pricing page
Abstrct
Hilarious but helpful too. Nice work
Abstrct
I built a UI automation testing system with Claude and it’s been really effective and hasn’t broken the bank. Highly recommend using tools to build tools.
Abstrct
I’m glad it’s not just us noticing! Fingers crossed a fix gets packaged with the next update
Abstrct
Thanks for the follow up!
Abstrct
At least in this app, historically this has not been the case. I know because I've spent years burning as many points as possible to maximize the point reset. As you talking about how the rule is written in the physical game?
Abstrct
Yeah the latest expansions are in that game. I haven't tested a game without the latest versions but I'll see if I can pull that off.
Edit: I was wrong! It did not have the very most recent, but the second most recent is there
Abstrct
A favourite for those that enjoy pushing the game to its breaking point
Abstrct
Ya, multiplayer with quite a few expansions enabled. I think this is the second time it happened but the first time we were second guessing ourselves. This time we saw the evidence in the background.
Abstrct
Fair question for sure. I guess it's knowing you're building a game for a niche.
Abstrct
Roughly my point exactly 😅
It's not about *intentionally* building games people don't like. And scammers can go f themselves without a doubt.
Abstrct
There are mechanism in gaming that are touchy subjects. Do you build with them anyways?
Abstrct
Sometimes it's just nice to have SOMETHING give an answer. Then the table can vote to agree/disagree and move on with their lives. It really doesn't matter if it's a hallucination or not, house rules have always existed.
Using the game for strategy though? They'd get chirped the f&%$ out for years on that. AI generally sucks at strategy though, just beat them and they'll stop.
Did you get a chance to try the rest of the games? How did it go?