u/BoilingJD

Yes, I actually directly worked on a high budget major studio Hollywood movie, still in production, that is being done 100% in resolve. The editor explicitly requested this pipeline as it enabled the whole finishing team to have a very fast turnaround on VFX plates and audio. And I know of two other features in Asia doing something similar. In general, as fas as offline edit is concerned, I'd say resolve market share is about 1% at the moment. It's not zero, but those who switches over did it for a reason, and they love it.

Hey, your Glacier eegress calculation is wrong, AWS egress is about 90$/TB + object class transition fee, depending on how you choose to retrieve. But you have to call up AWS and get a deal, if you got 100TB + to store you can get a good discount.

Secondly. you have to factor in cashflow, the advantage of AWS is not that it's cheap, it's not, it's that is amortises your cashflow - you don't have to spend a lot of money upfront for storage that you don't know if you'll be able to fill. It's CapEx vs OpEx kind of dilemma.

use CRM as ticketing solution - users feel like they talking to a specific person, but all conversations are properly funnelled and assigned agains fake "projects" on the back end.

so I did go and buy it, I regret nothing, it actually works exactly as advertised and I've been very happy with it for past few years. The picture is brighter, the blacks are darker. Had that 20£ screen for 3 years now. No regrets. In my case there is definitely difference between two sides of the material

If a project is only 600GB and can be fully cached locally, just get Amove and use B2 or Wasabi as back-end storage. can'y get cheaper than this.

all of these videos, except Gerald Undone are made by people who have no clue what they are talking about or what the dials they are working with actually do.

if this really has to be in-hardware, use SDI instead of HDMI, you can have blackmagic card with 8 input channels per PCIE slot, then you only need 2-3 servers

Massive.io is used extensively in film industry for secure file transfer. If you want to self-host, Filerun has good audit logging and is way easier and faster than Owncloud/Nextcloud.

start moshpits during death metal shows at local dive bar. Great way to make friends.👍

so..... if you want immediate access, just get another, large NAS and expand it over time. TCO over 5 years of a NAS (or DIY TrueNAS) is about $1/TB/Month if you have the upfront CapEx. Just do the math on what's your real retention policy.

If you want to upload to cloud, cheapest option with free egress is B2 at $6/TB/Month, however due to nature of object storage works, you can't natively "stream" files from it directly, but if you make very low rez proxies as part of your archival, you can slap something like Amove.io in front of B2 and somewhat gat away with it. (Amove will provide experience similar to OneDrive/GoogleDrive)

You can also try Archiware P5 archival to LTOs - it has a mini built in MAM that makes very low rez proxies.

Or just get good at making proixes that can live on a nas and dump native media to LTO then make sure everything is labeled so that you can conform from LTO

Something to understand here though is whatever you do, there is a CaEx and OpEx cost. You have to accept that. there is no magical way to just cut down storage cost beyond cost of single HDD, while keeping all media accessible at any time.

The issue with Shade is that their current business model is unsustainable, they are just a startup, trying to brute force into the market by offering really low pricing, but guaranteed to 10x the price in the future. Or die trying. This is a very common SaaS startup model. Unfortunately they have not re-invented the wheel and someone still needs to pay for all that transcoding compute

Suite is basically carbon copy of LucidLink, with small differentiators like upload applet, but it is more limited if you have large operation, also more limited support by nature of being smaller company.

IMO there is no real replacement to LucidLink. LL is a very mature platform with high degree of flexibility and strong enterprise support. Also, your assessment is somewhat flawed, for each LL user you effectively get 400GB/month of free storage, so there is no real user fee.

It feels like that's what recruiters want, despite that never being the case because people tend to get promoted until they get to a level they they suck at but too senior to let go and settle into mid management where they can feel important enough to matter but not given enough power to do serious damage, while the underlying team carries the weight of their incompetent boss, who may be a brilliant engineer, but utterly shit at managing people, he just said yea to promotion cause he like the moneeey

I'm quite fascinated by the amount of negative comments from people who clearly never worked in "mission-critical" environments. Just because you don't like this SLA doesn't mean you can shit on someone's work. I work for myself, I don't have employees, it's my SLA and I'm one of the few and very best people in the world at what I do. I signed up for this, and I want better tooling to make my life and work better. What's ya'all problem ?

that sounds excellent, but I want an off the shelf product. I feel like this should already exist in the wild...

the issue is that the device that needs support is not always a "managed device" - a director may be trying to use personal laptop to connect to a stream or some such thing...

If I could have a link in my email header that basically says "if you need support, click this" which would initiate remote session from client side, put in in a queue and notify a tech. that would do the trick... I feel like Zoho Assist does something like this, but haven't used it in long time and it's not the best overall tool.

ooh now this is interesting...

tried this with Jitsi, sounded ok in theory, but was not workable in practice. Also main focus here is getting remote access to the end user machine as soon as possible, basically at same time as user raises issue.

other than pricing, is there any real issues with TeamViewer

This is standard workflow for my industry. When you have a hotshot director in the edit, if something breaks, there ain't no time to open tickets and fill forms. There is a phone in each room and support is on speed dial. The issue is, more and more people want to work hybrid or do pop-up edits and I want to cut down on the generic "Who are you, where are you, what's your workstation ID?" because some people can get really pissy about it like "do you not know who I Am?!!". And they are not some generic white collar office plankton, so I can't tell them to STFU and send email to helpdesk. I'm not there to argue with them, but to provide immediate support, like IT paramedic, that's what I'm paid for.

as a woman, you get thousands of likes just from pictures alone, easier to collect the likes or the super likes, and then pick who to match with from those, no point in adding bio, no one reads it anyway, and if you do, you will still be lost in the sea of those who don't.

tip 1: don't nick random stock clips from BM sample library.

tip 2: get some shitty footage and learn how to make that look decent, hot to fix it - this will actually teach you 90% of what colorist does

tip 3: find a sample edit project and focus on figuring out how to get a look that is CONSISTENT across multiple different shots

Massaging one, already perfectly lit shot, out of context is not gonna teach you anything, except the basics of what every button and slider does

low level spam

funny enough I'm actually working on a high budget feature that will be end-to-end done in resolve. but it is very unique situation, with the lead editor driving this decision and taking all liability for workflow.

Your question is wrong.

1. for offline edits it's not post house decision they will provide whatever the editor wants
2. for finishing 90% of post houses already run on resolve