u/CannonPinion

My wind chimes are ready

BBSes did nothing wrong

1. Respect: Here at Uncle Mike's Concrete Loafer Emporium, everyone's got a seat at the table. Everyone matters, everyone's got a role, capisce?

2. Quality Commitment: At Uncle Mike's, we ain't just making any ol' loafers. Nah, we're crafting top-notch stuff here. Our clients gotta say, "That's some pair of loafers!" each time, every time.

3. Ethical Foundation: No funny business at Uncle Mike's. We're as straight as a ruler. Honest work for honest dough, that's how we do things here.

4. Trustworthiness: Over here, trust ain't just a five-letter word. It's a promise. You got a job, we're on it. No questions, no fuss.

5. Reliability: Uncle Mike's ain't about surprises. We're steady, reliable. You got needs, we're meetin' 'em.

6. Resource Stewardship: We ain't wasteful at Uncle Mike's. Everything's got potential, and we make sure we squeeze every bit outta it.

7. Confidentiality: Got secrets? We can keep 'em. We understand the value of a closed mouth, know what I mean?

8. Community Impact: We're about more than just concrete loafers. We're about the community. We're here to make things better for the neighborhood.

9. Teamwork: At Uncle Mike's, we work together like a family. The best ideas, the best loafers, they come from working side by side with each other, clients, and the occasional fish.

10. Transparency: At Uncle Mike's, what you see is what you get. We're as clear as concrete, keeping things upfront and straight.

High Vor five!

Of course! And I have to hand it to you - your observation was second-to-none re: very accurate, technically correct comments.

This guy chronometers

archive.is exists

60% of the time, that robe works 100% of the time

He was in like Flynn with that joke

Has he actually unambiguously violated the code of conduct of his office? I'm asking genuinely.

Seriously? There is no code of conduct or code of ethics for the United States Supreme Court.

Who is going to sign a warrant to search Thomas' office? Alito?

This is an extremely literal example of the phrase "rules for thee but not for me".

If you can, explain how it is “dehumanizing” to not want gender ideology civil rights women's rights to be taught to your children in public school?

Same mindset, different generation. If you can't accept people for who they are, and are offended by those who can, maybe you're the problem.

Look up the Mayan "milpa cycle", the "three sisters", and "terra preta".

The Far Side addressed this.

We may be in for some disappointment.

Corrected link (missing the "l" at the end): https://github.com/esphome/firmware/blob/main/voice-assistant/m5stack-atom-echo.yaml

Have you seen the movie "Her"?

You have seen the TPS report, right?

All you need to know about sport: "The thing about Arsenal is that they always try and walk it in"

Zipcar has entered the chat

Fantastic job, thanks for your effort.

There's a fine line between gross ineptitude and "failed successfully" - hoping from the response that it's the former.

Do you think the tech industry will become more privacy oriented?

No, it will only get more invasive over time. The best one can do is to host as much software as possible yourself, behind your own firewall, and adopt a "grey man" stance for everything you can't host. That means VPN routing through jurisdictions with better privacy regulations (EU), disposable email addresses for sign-ups, etc etc.

NRK had a series of "slow TV" shows where a camera was strapped to the front of a train and they filmed the entire journey from start to finish, through tunnels and along fjords, etc.

Three of them are linked on the Wikipedia page for Slow TV and don't require a VPN to access. If she is able to recognize her country, she might enjoy this, and they are quite long.

Hop along, my little friends, up the Withywindle!
Tom's going on ahead candles for to kindle.
Down west sinks the Sun: soon it will be behind ya. Spark up these candles that smell like Tom's vagina!

You've gone too far, pull back!

Boromir tries to take the Evo

Why are the erroneous articles not peer reviewed and debunked?

When someone asks you if you're a god peer-reviewed, you say "yes"!