u/Crafty_Mall9578

sorry mate

yes, but then why do you compare like that? what is the point of your comparison?
what do you mean the "math doesnt seem to math"?

u work for large enterprise and didnt know copilot now use token-based pricing or what?
you assume copilot usage is $20 while claude is $600 wheb they basically the same lmao?

who is even considered claudecode is better?

correct, sol xhigh is not needed most of the case (ultra long horizon work)
for just normal iterative/interactive feature development, luna beats everything else

imo except subagents (and a bit of loop), others are just useless bloat eating context.

just curious, why switch after the acquistion?

opencode is better for me bc of its web serve & native worktree workflow is awesome!
can run anywhere, work anywhere, just browser.
worktree help doing more parallel work much easier.

if u use greed-ass claude just stick to claude
what is the point of using opencode or asking here?
why are you assuming claude sub in opencode sub-reddit?
when you tried opencode you tried it with claude sub too? what was your original comparison?

reas my 1st comment :)

google it (or ask your whatever agent u use to research it for you)
opencode can use your chatgpt sub.
opencode is more token efficient than codex.
u math?

doing the right math is also a skill
OP doesn't even know the different between the tool and model providers.
Except greedass anthropic which provider sub can not be used in opencode?

for enterprise, all provider (openai, anthropic) all charge PAYG.
no different using openai/anthropic/ghcp.
other than that
- claude is worst bc it 100 locked u on its shit
- openai and ghcp both allow usage of other tools/providers (like both ghcp and openai allow usage of opencode...)
- ghcp offer others thing compare to openai: multiple models, allow cross-model usage, autocomplete, etc.

They can just release a nano/mini version later. They didn't publish a replacement recommendation yet.
At the end, it is just efficiency, if you need more intelligence, pay for bigger model, otherwise, stitch to your 5.4-mini/nano.

the article say /compact only rebuilt a short summary, how is it real? since compact still sending the whole conversation to rebuild, isn't that just the same as continuing session (since conversation get new cache anyway?)

compact is useful when convo getting too long but I see nothing related to cache-rebuild here. can someone explain?

why my company faced an issue that maximum quota is 30$ and can not enable additional charge due to ghcp bug (they said github will try to solve it by the end of this month?)

its anthropic way of burning more tokens without being noticed 😘😘

should never switch to claude lol
use any of opencode go, codex, ollama pro is 10x better than claude pro
with claude u need 5x at least

just find another provider if u want 3.2? why on earth not serving a model u like is their fault?

you misread teams.
team come with usage. (125% of pro or max5, depend on your seat). just this is enough to decide what to buy.

most of times when i ask opus to review gpt coding output, opus responds with "approved"
gpt review opus? not that good (and opus agree)

sorry but u're wrong about power of prompting you lose me after that

sorry, but most anthropic/claude fan boi i know are all like this 😂😂 u shouldn't have told them anything like other models are better (even at just some specific jobs)

sorry? what is this hallucinations? reading wall of text still not understanding reasoning behind your claims. don't want to be offensive but this all read like "skill issues" to me...

to some extend. 400k should be allll u need.