u/ElCorazonMC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_field_entoptic_phenomenon

tempest

I aim at "lifelike realism"

I sculpted it and had a blast doing so (I took the head from someone else).

I tried 100% metallic and it looks nice, but not realistic at all...

Think this when "blackwall" : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Firewall , with state-of-the-art AI to make it shiny

You are responsible of what you imagine, for it influences the shape of the future.

Why do you fancy such sad urbanism ? You could be looking forward to living in such places :

https://www.reddit.com/r/fuckcars/comments/166rxnh/this_is_the_future_that_urbanists_want/

A huge stretch yes, as is your labelling of terrorism on such a minor inconvenience posed to some people.

Is the emitter the only culprit, and not the consumer? Of course political action and legal pursuits against the oil companies is necessary.

So I am a narcissist? What else can you infer of my personality given the few hundred words we echanged semi-anonymously? A psychopath, a pervert, an asocial, a sociopath, a schizophrenic, a bipolar, a maniac, a monster, a demon?

You might wanna revise your classification, as there is no destruction in deflating tires.

1.6l 3 cylinder eco turbo SUV

haha classic, let's hide our already too-big-of-a-car beneath the 3.0l V6 F-150.

LoL.

Law enforcement in France is not even agreeing that deflating tires is a minor offense. The legal risk is very near to zero.

You are inverting the argument, I find it funny.

Personal vehicles use 1000 times more energy than acting online, so let's put the blame first on the online territory, not the car society.

Yeah, you do you.

Do you condemn any terrorist? In my country, resistance against nazism was called terrorism at that time.

Freedom is the ability to do whatever the fuck you want without altering the ability of others to do the fuck they want. By emitting 25tCO2eq/y/capita, you are preventing several other people on earth from living.
You need to get ready to restrict heavily your freedom for everyone to keep enjoying it.

When the legal system is illegitimate, direct action becomes legitimate.

You get more GHG marginally, and only if you consider that these actions have 0 effect. In practice they have, we are at a meager hundred SUVs deflated in Paris, and I already see the facebook marketplace filled with SUV second-hand deals.

So emitting 25 tons of CO2 per capita per year is fine? That's the US average : 12 times above what's considered sustainable.

Do you not recognize climate change as caused by humanity?

If so, it is anyone's duty to help curb emissions, (and preserve biodiversity, for your next fight).

There's a problem, online activities for an average person range in the kilos of CO2. Driving around a personal vehicle ranges around tons of CO2 per year.

You are comparing activities that are three orders of magnitude apart in term of GHG emissions.

​

P.S. Yea I'm from Paris... if I was living in North America I'd be even more ashamed of my country.

For anybody interested in having any kind of real clue, I recommend

Andreas Malm, How to Blow Up a Pipeline.

As they should

You are so sensitive in your monster cars, love it.

The politician is the mere reflect of the society.

Direct action like this has proven to work very, very well.
Sweden SUV sales were cut at least by a quarter few years ago.
Such a cut in sales would offset by several orders of magnitude any environmental cost directly associated to the action, as you claimed.

Heads up North America, join the fight!

Direct action like this has proven to work very, very well.

Sweden SUV sales were cut at least by a quarter few years ago.

Heads up North America, join the fight!

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2019/oct/25/suvs-second-biggest-cause-of-emissions-rise-figures-reveal

Les sportives prennent tarif aussi, mais c'est encore plus anecdotique.

Hop, un petit jugement à l'emporte-pièce, ça permet de se dire qu'après tout on est dans le camp de ceux qui ont raison.