u/FXur

Im not surprised to be honest. I think their difficulty in both comprehending a post like this and their need to denounce it come from the same root cause.

Ok

You think standard deviation can "adopt error bars" and are struggling to wrap your head around data normalization as a concept. Maybe finish your high school applications before lil-bro'ing people online.

Standard deviation doesn't have an error bar, it is the error bar. you're just outing yourself as someone who no clue what you're talking about. Also youre not changing any sample size clueless.

Half the comments are hilarious. This one guy u/TheMetaHorde dropped this unironic banger "your standard deviation adopts potentially massive error bars"

Google the word youre complaining about

Bro its not that big of a deal that the deck you main was ranked low. Your rant didn't refute the post it just exposed you as being 100% clueless in stats too. Im still trying to wrap my head around "Yes you can normalize numbers but: you can only weight and adjust the data for it so much. At some point you either just make up numbers" I cant for the life of me figure out what you think data normalization is

Every decks skill expression will be directly correlated to the deck that it faces already. Azalina is probably harder to onetrick than most decks since your own deck changes every game.

No you wouldnt. If the deck loses when it doesn't copy another decks wincon it will show up in the matchup winrate data and with a large sample it will approach the expected mean.

You guys are too funny the post says self-scaling and because you interpreted it as mad about scaling in general the poster must be wrong.

Thank you

Nor is it Asian

Look, to me parodying the Hans Niemann accusations seems more unoriginal than pushing comedic boundaries.

When I have time I'll watch an old episode and a new episode to see if its really the same material or if its a corporatized/watered down version of itself, and Ill let you know what I think.

In my opinion Seinfeld is a relatively tame show that could air in some of histories more conservative societies, unless Im forgetting some themes.

To be honest I don't know (or really care) when Seinfeld made his statement but I doubt he said it in 2005 when IASIP piloted, more likely it was made over a decade later, making the comment I responded to irrelevant.

Its being cashed in on still, but its not exactly the same show. While some of the more raunchy humor is grandfathered in, its reeled in. Its 2018-2025 seasons each rank significantly lower individually than every individual season from 2006-2017 by rating.

IASIP has blackface in multiple episodes. It piloted in 2005 not 2025.

Your math is off. Its the same as asking for $0.10

Spending money wouldnt lower his net worth since he'd still own whatever he bought.

5 min per win sounds very reasonable for an aggro deck. While 19-0 is unlikely, we aren't talking about a pr, we're talking about the fastest ever.

No, its pretty much the expected time to legend for 11 stars racing to legend with an aggressive deck.

I dont know the exact record but its closer to 1 hour.

They wait until only bad players are still stuck in diamond.

The wind was at +1.7m/s, which is just about the most advantageous condition allowed. Under 0 wind, the same sprinters would be ~0.25-0.3s slower.

Yup, and this year's Nobel Peace Prize was given to someone trying to stand up to Venezuela's current corrupt government.

They're not a fan, its astroturfing.