u/FotographicFrenchFry

Hes around the age that I was when I started to question my religious background. So I have some hope.

I'm sure you look like your family tree is a wreath.

Nobody here gives a shit what you feel. If you're not here to talk constructively about the show then GTFO.

But you're going into a subreddit that supports the show to intentionally be an ass and shit all over it. You could've just kept your mouth shut and gone back to trektalk

Then get the hell out of a Discovery-supporting subreddit dude.

So you're being an intentional asshole.

r/trektalk is where the real dog piling happens.

Post anything positive there and you are down voted into oblivion.

It's a constant bitch-and-moan fest about how Alex Kurtzman personally killed their childhoods and other crybaby bullshit.

Objectively hilarious image response. I hear that in my head lol

But yeah, I do political campaigns and it's the best tool for parsing through massive amounts of data to get easy-to- understand insights on that data.

Plus I have it do donor research and things like that.

Obviously I check the work but I'm a one man band managing half a dozen campaigns.

I concur. Research must be conducted. Poorly of a scientific nature

Is Dr Strange not going to be in this one?

Wilfred lol

If only some previous President had negotiated a deal with them that held up well... If only...

He sounds like such a whiny little bitch.

Yeah and unfortunately she’s already at max capacity for boyfriends atm. But maybe soon?

The Democrats don't want to lick the boots of government. But they see the institutions and still fixable and changable. And that's what we want too, is change.

But the alternative is letting people suffer because of the domino effect of eliminating whole swathes of government that they just don't care enough to learn more about, and that's what we're pissed off about.

Even if they wanted to eliminate things, fine, that's the will of the voters. But they seemingly are doing it even in the face of constant corrections and reminders that they fucked up over and over again. And their response is a general shoulder shrug, followed by a "cry harder libtard" or something to that effect.

I've not heard one provable example that what they've cut has actually benefitted anyone but the rich asshats who want to privatize everything so they can make a profit off of things that should be general services.

Again, I agree that there should be tight oversight on where our tax dollars are spent. But that includes giving Elon (the richest man on the planet) billions of dollars of our money as tax subsidies and credits so he can blow up another rocket (sorry, "rapid unscheduled disassembly").

He doesn't need our money. Bezos doesn't need it. Soros doesn't need it. The Kochs (sorry, singular now) don't need it. Gates doesn't need it. Buffet doesn't need it.

If these men want investments, they should "bootstrap" themselves up and invest their massive net worths into their projects, instead of taking it from us.

They're trying to run government like a business. But that's not what government it. Government isn't there to turn a profit. It's there to provide services to its people.

In Nevada, our constitution mandates that our state budget is not to exceed what we can prove to be revenue for the upcoming biennium. We're never in debt because we don't spend more than we have.

That also means that we ensure that the services we are providing are equitable, paid for, and have as little-to-no fraud or waste in them as possible. And we do that with only 120 days every other year for our legislature. The federal government absolutely should be able to do the same.

But Republicans love spending like drunken sailors and then giving Democrats the poison pill of either continuing the spending so they can rail against them about the debt, or cutting programs and entitlements so they can rail against them about losing benefits.

It's a catch-22 that the Republicans set up in the days of Reagan and hasn't let up since.

Sell and put part of it in TSLZ. It’s a 2x inverse leveraged ETF that goes up 2% for ever 1% TSLA goes down.

I put everything into TSLZ, a 2x inverse leveraged ETF tracking TSLA.

For every 1% it goes down, TSLZ goes up by 2.

Even with all the deregulation, oil companies aren’t going to increase production.

That would increase supply and lower their record profits. Never gonna happen.

I did similar- threw everything in TSLZ, 2x inverse leveraged ETF.

That's actually part of the "terrible president" part.

Truly, I don't think Bush was actually fully aware of all that was going on.

Kind of like with Trump, conservative groups found a useful idiot that was dorky and funny enough to charm the masses, and then hid behind that to get their own goals completed.

If it was actually up to him, and they had actually given him real information and not fabricated bullshit, I think there would have been a very different outcome.

Still an awful President who did lasting damage to a lot of people and places. But unlike Trump, I don't think it was ever intentional, nor fueled by personal malice.