u/LiveClick2107

ping shouldnt be affected much by your distance (20-30ms), its somewhere on your system, fire tv stick was often a problem

maybe they know that playing one ubisoft title is like having played all ubisoft titles

crash bandicoot and spyro are 15€ every month on steam. if you just buy them, you saved a lot of money. and mw3 is basically cheaper buying than 2 month of that "offer" when you buy it on sale on steam. this is basically only better when you cant wait less than a month playing those and need all at once.

im not downvoting you. and im not saying its not boosteroid fault. but you need to consider your hardware at fault. for example if i use linux, one distro works right out of the box, the other doesnt at all. on fire tv stick it does not work for me at all. ireland is a bit far away, but i think it shouldnt be such a problem ping wise. you can calculate it online (usual ping per distance). also its important to get your wifi environment clean, switch to a wifi channel not used by others

its mouse and keyboard only, so you probably filtered by "controller"

wow just wow

now we need 007 game next week. that, batman and horizon 6 might be enough for the whole year, for me at least.

i dont want to loose the freedom to check latest stuff on steam, just because people like you dont know how to follow the most simple rules

(sure, maybe a warning or 2 would help)

its available. there are steam curator pages that keep track of steam games available on boosteroid, might check one of those

i think graphics are often on ultra low (literally lowest), you cant change it + its max 1440p

eeer...no, thats exactly the opposite of what the numbers say.

the graphics are worse (i would say by far) and you have way less games available. ps 5 is still fun though.

except for ea and hoyoverse thats like 4 games in maintenance. they should name that site upperoid .com

Just buy a computer, you can buy a decent one for $900.

thats over a hundred months of boosteroid

maintenance for example rockstar as a company has been focusing on gta 6

rockstar games are online, except la noire rn, and except in brazil propably

would be nice if you scrolled through the settings, so the potential culprit could be seen

they did that, and were even ready to still keep the same price available. i think it was planned to be higher price for all the new updates and old price for old experience. and idk how you could do it more fair. but now the hardware advancements stalled. thats rly dumb to say the least, but hey, i still play all my games on max settings 120 fps on the old hardware.

btw, your suggested price increase would only cover inflation. and its basically the regular price from like 2 years ago.

i think boosteroid just wants to be the lowest price available, and it is. and still they compete (maybe not surpass) with all the other streaming services.

isnt the service 8 bucks and for 14 bucks you have some qol like server selection?

yes, you dont subscribe to a specific game in the first place. its very simple logic. its not that you bought a pc, you bought basically to a new experiment the biggest companies on earth struggle to maintain in a specific scale. stuff happens. you have a big library in front of you, maybe hundred of games, maybe dozens of AAA. i mean yes you have the right to complain, but i have the right to comment on your complaint as i wish. and i showed the actual numbers. and the numbers show, boosteroid does an above excellent job at keeping games online EXCEPT for hoyoverse and ea, and with ea you could argue its not rly their fault.

i mean you can complain, but it, and maybe more specifically the scale it happens in, doesnt make much sense to me. at least not in this situation.

its just a marginal error thats it. a bit of missing communication. i can understand why from your persepective its such a big thing.

maybe i see it a bit too neutral, maybe if i signed for one single game out of the sheer number i would think different. but then again, i think i wouldnt know how to complain, i would see what boosteroid is, how it operates, see how other streaming services work and then think "well thats just how it is, hope they can improve in the future"

maybe complain a bit, but then just accept it. and not act like its the worst kind, bc they cant bring on that 0.2% of games

not really bad comparison

yes, or you just accept it, because looking at the library its a marginal error so to speak. you dont get your game, several hundreds more to play at max settings 120 fps or unsubscribe.

and still you interfered with me setting things straight

for example i think OP post is ultra valid, it shows wich game is on maintenance for how long, the only valid general conclusion from it is, that boosteroid has pretty low number of games on maintenance. except for ea and hoyoverse ofc. i wish they would take these games out of the library, but only for this sub not be cluttered with the same empty complaints anymore