u/MasterPhuc

Which state are you in? I’d be interested in coming in person to take a look and working out a fair price.

Trundle. Huge value on sion, pillar for naut q/setup

Better off taking Tate and trading him down the road

You’re very weak going second with no item lock or evo play. Multiple fire breathers also kind of a brick when you’re lacking draw support through your own mons. You also have too many energy retrieval options and not enough search (vessel). Mixing 70hp and 80hp mander is better so you have more puffin targets. There are some decent fire single prizer that you could add to provide some flexibility in attacks.

Used to play a bit of collegiate back in the day, on and off now. Would be down if you’re interested ign: masterphuc

I would say before all the catch up exp and extended range on exp, stomping top then was the most rewarding. This is a close second since they can catch back up now and still have relevant impact in team fights.

Riftbound has been great to learn and got its own unique mechanics that makes the game interesting and distinct from other TCGs

This gets ask a lot, but I feel like most people have forgotten about set 1 sprinkler graves. RFC + Cursed Blade was broken af with graves autos hitting almost the entire board at once

Sounds like you’ve sold yourself on Neal lol. IMO just iso the trade to him. This trade is Love side favored by a mile for everyone else.

It depends on your situation. Personally I think you’re getting fair value. Nico’s 26 with a fair amount of injury. I think if you want to max your value you could let em know you want to wait till draft day and then see if you like whoever falls to 1.06 🤷🏻‍♀️. Overall I think it’s a fair trade if you’re looking to rebuild. You’re not getting 3 first out of him and maybe you can keep your 2nd with the counter and they’ll still accept.

😂😂😂 “simply make a new currency”. pretty sure the simplest approach is to unalive you

It’s a build diff. She’s got more damage and sustain than you. FoN is a very underwhelming item to build and normally you would only build so tanky if you are super ahead. Not having some form of healing reduction on her doesn’t help either, but it’s mostly building FoN over a bruiser dmg item that made this way harder for you.

The leverage of holding on to the domain should be more than enough to get google to come to negotiation table though. The domain should remain in his possession throughout this process and google would be severely impacted. Even if they can win legally, they wouldn’t be winning in the overall scheme of things so he definitely could’ve gotten more money from it. This is assuming he had the option to keep the domain without the provider force yoinking it back.

This is awesome work! Personally, I think the matrix theme design is a bit tacky haha but overall love the idea.

Mage itemization just rather you build everything else. Spending money on orb delays RoA or Seraphs if you’re building scaling and delaying torch for orb just doesn’t feel that good since the damage out weights the healing reduction. You also heavily delay your boots upgrade if you get feats. As well as ever since the item overhaul, this is just how league is since they pushed to incentivize you to complete your items more than holding partial.

You might still arrive at 10pm flying viet jet. From personal experience, they’re always delayed domestic or international. If you’re flying out of hnd with a lot of time then just spend it inside of Tokyo imo otherwise you pray VJ doesn’t fk up too much.

This is a tough one and I do use it here and there when making decisions, but you also need to include the alternative is saving that money and compounding it and not just this cost X per day.

Personally, helll no. You’re giving up way too much. Egbuka is looking generational and soo fun to watch and alone is easily worth Nico + Warren.

You mentioned not finding a blocker that works for you, I’d love to hear from you why this blocker works vs the ones you’ve tried? Was there some study done or at least a reasonably sized survey that indicated this form of blocking is effective? Since several screen time apps now offer “friction” before accessing again.

To be transparent, I’m also building an app that’s relevant to screen time and I’ve done a number of research on available app.

Edit: Associating a green screen for access seems a bit counter intuitive as you are building it as a way to get folks to not waste time. I think a message of sort that says we’ll unblock but don’t stay too long of sort would probably be better.

Egbuka purely bc I rather watch Baker and the Bucs than the bears

Np, Supabase definitely has its issues but it has its strength. If you want the best of both worlds in this situation, phone OTP with quick copy from message to keyboard is probably the most stable and easy user experience (although it will cost a little bit more money). Perhaps there is an easy solution for the Apple auth that you can find, just providing an alt path here as releasing MVP should be priority #1 when building imo.

I’m developing an iOS app rn as well but haven’t gotten to the Apple auth yet so might hit this issue later; however, I can say that if you’re looking to move forward and not waste time going back and redoing your entire BE, I think just sticking with email OTP is good enough for an MVP release as users can stay logged in and everyone is fairly familiar with OTPs nowadays.

My client side query did include a select after, it was a lack of understanding of RLS from my end on it and I didn't explain that I had a select after the insert as I thought the insert would still go through. I was building the policies out one at a time and didn't realized it would cause the entire query to return RLS error instead of a partial where the insert would be successful and then fail on the select.

let _ = try await client
                .from("activity_report")
                .insert(ActivityReport())
                .select()
                .single()
                .execute()
                .value

So I thought it was failing on the insert the whole time, but it was a misunderstanding on my part.

Oh wow, this did end up being it. So it didn't start working with no changes haha. I added in a view policy since I couldn't see the record after inserts on the dashboard as an auth user and then everything started working client side.
This makes a lot of sense as client side I am running a select after insert and so it failed earlier when I didn't have a select policy.

Thank you so much for the insight!