u/MilesGates

So what do you think a possible solution is? The media examples show they don't have a lot of Mexican characters to start with and you need to show everything you've just said. How could anyone do that? I'm not sure anyone could. 

Not counting background street npcs, cyberpunk maybe has like 5 Mexican characters? Even just trying to find out how many there are led me to another post where someone talks about how amazing they thought representation was. 

https://www.reddit.com/r/cyberpunkgame/comments/km8gcx/mexican_culture_references_in_the_game/

The commentors being unable to take a joke is hilarious. Probably even funnier than the clip itself. 

"I don't need to pay attention to the rules because there are bigger cars out there, here let me ride my bike on the highway, other people can just press their brakes for me"

It doesn't matter who is bigger or who is smaller, who is younger or who is older.

Your plan involves allowing people to do dangerous things putting people at terrible danger of injury or even death.

My plan involves the person who started all of this to follow the rules of the road that they were tested on and agreed to part take in while obtaining their drivers license.

Who are you to decide that the van driver can continue to put people in dangerous situations just because they are ignorant of their actions?

You are required to pay attention on the road, How much does that Van weigh? How many people could it kill?

and just so we're clear, All your questions? The van driver would happily run them all over.

Sure I can answer that question because it's already been answered by the van driver who decided to change lanes without doing a shoulder check.

The van driver fully believes that he is in the right and can do whatever he wants no matter if it causes the death of the truck driver, the child inside the car, or a third party.

If you want to solve the problem, Fix the van driver. If he did a proper shoulder check he wouldn't have changed lanes and thus the truck driver won't have to brake for anything.

You're right you did say that, and I'm stating that if we truly want to ensure that everybody is safe on the road and including the children that you brought up, the most important thing is for the van driver to ensure they do shoulder checks when changing lanes.

if that occurs then the truck driver literally doesn't have to change a single thing, There would be nothing for him to press the brake for.

You are trying to fix this one specific problem, I am trying to fix future problems.

Yes it does, You're literally replying to a comment thread that the very first comment stated
"But.. none of that matters anymore if you end up with a dead child in the backseat"

So no, None of the insurance fault matters, a dead child is the only thing that matters. honestly, Who cares about either car being damaged?

answer my question, how many damaged cars is a single child's life worth?
Would you accept insurance holding you at fault for an accident that you didn't cause if it meant a child could be brought back to life? I would.

You continue to worry about the insurance costs and fault for those 2 people, meanwhile I'm worried about the safety of the road and the children that are specifically being spoken about in this thread.

👌

Right so if the van driver is an idiot why aren't you starting with him? That's my question? 

You're focused on avoiding accidents awhile allowing the accident causer to go create more accidents. 

So im asking you the question which is more important. The life of a child or the insurance payout. 

You're missing the point. 

The truck driver slams on the break presses the break whatever. 

Situation resolved right? 

Van continues on like nothing happens right? 

Van decides to do another nolook lane change and slams into another car, their car flips and the child inside the van dies. 

What are you missing that changing anything the truck driver does will not fix the main issue that the Van driver is doing dangerous things causing these problems. 

The truck driver pressing his break does not solve the issue of the dangerous driver on the road. 

If the Van driver learns to properly do shoulder checks when doing lane changes than the truck driver doesn't have to do literally anything. 

Your solution solves nothing. Mine does. 

So the kid safety isn't important anymore now its just your wallet that is the concern? 

Great so you use magical powers to slow down the truck driver. Good job. 

There is still a deadly driver on the road that will cause the same problem to the next car they come across. 

That is my point. Fix the truck driver for 10 billion years and you'll still never get the dangerous driver off the road. 

No matter what the truck driver goes the van driver would literally do something dangerous the very next moment they get. 

Nobody is responsible for the safety of your child, if you want to protect them you do everything in your power to do so, the very first step is learning to drive carefully. 

The van is 100% at fault they need to change their behavior if they want to protect their kids. 

Right so if the goal is to avoid an accident why don't you just say the van should be doing shoulder checks and leave it at that? 

Anything you say about the trucker seems pretty useless, a dangerous driver will still be on the road no matter what the truck driver does so let's focus on the van and ensure they understand changing lanes which comes way before defense driving methods. 

Just as much as the van does it seems. Cutting people off is dangerous and can lead to deaths as well. 

There's no definitive definition of a hike. 

Trying to decide if something is a walk or hike it's nearly impossible. 

If you decide one rule like cetain elevations you suddenly rule out so many things that would be considered a hike by other people. 

A walk/hike is whatever you want it to be, proving that to others is hard. 

Lol where am I going to go?

Parking will be expensive. 

Drinks or food will be expensive. 

Why would I not stay home where all of that is cheap? 

what do you mean it connects to amazon Alexa, What am I supposed to say? Alexa please clean my asshole?

You're commenting on a month long post you're not even in. You're not arguing anything. You're whining about something a month old. 

Seriously. I can't imagine replying to something a month old. 

I didn't read the title right. I thought the guy was going to play a joke and pull out a teddy bear or some stuffed animal lol

this isn't a debate, it's a comment section. I've given you information you can google if you so choose to, I am not your debate partner, I am not your teacher, if you want to learn, go learn, or choose to be ignorant.

and the pattern repeats

Again, You've been told, you instead want others to jump through more hoops just so you can avoid admitting you're wrong.

You have the argument, read it.

Again so much weaseling, Was told multiple times in multiple different ways exactly what to do but instead pretends he doesn't understand how to read.

Sure thing bud, just try to find another person who would agree to that fact, Most people would just say no, but not you!~