u/Objective_Row6255
Objective_Row6255
Objective_Row6255
1% of your subjective thoughts are private and i can not afford to violate privacy rights. The rest, objective mind, is shared as a private message, protecting common and objecfive rights. Thanks.
Objective_Row6255
yes, that's what I am arguing, but using science. Thanks for sharing.
Objective_Row6255
I think you still have a lot to learn.
Objective_Row6255
sure, it's just that you are too stupid to understand it.
Objective_Row6255
Thank you, really!
Objective_Row6255
Hi,
Neuroridge is a sofware that connect and uploads minds into computers, broadcasting them into virtual realities onto devices. Now what kind of problems does it solve? First, a mute woman is now using the tech to communicate with her social entourage remotely and wirelessly. Second, it is used in gaming, creating neuro-games, the kind of games that one creates using his/her mind. Third, it is usef to create digital items such as books, articles, music, and short videos.
Currently, 30 experiments have been conducted. Most of them were successful by an accuracy level of at least 80%.
Objective_Row6255
Currently, I am building the website. It might take some time. In the meantime, i invite to dm. This way, you'll get all your questions answered.
Objective_Row6255
I am considering it, but I don't understand what you mean by proof in this context. Thanks.
Objective_Row6255
Hi,
Thank you for taking the time to read and ask this question,
Sorry if i wasn't clear enough.
No, dont worry! It's not chat gpt. But like i said, it's mind-uploading. So where does the mind uploads? It is uploaded into artificial intelligence. Why? Because artificial intelligence reduces the errors and biases in your thoughts. Artificial intelligence also takes cares of ordering the chaotic and emotional nature of your thoughts before structuring them and transforming them into discourses.
Hope this explains everything.
Objective_Row6255
To clarify: we do not use implants, wearables, or any external interface—by design. The experiment is evaluated by its outputs, not by the presence of cables. In the YouTube Shorts demo, the run executed while I was asleep. I built the system myself using quantum programming plus AI. It applies quantum entanglement as the organizing idea—treating the mind and the software as correlated states—so the program can capture latent patterns I’m not consciously aware of and transform them into mini-games. If by “proof” you mean documentation, we can share time-stamped logs, reproducible seeds/builds, and independent re-runs. But the core point stands: no interface does not mean no experiment—the reproducible outputs are the evidence.
Objective_Row6255
It is always advised to carefully do some research before saying anything too biased. If you can't search, I'll just type into chat-gpt for you. You are deeply welcome.
In the meantime, I ask you to cultivate yourself. That's fine for me, but generally, this is seen as a sign of low IQ, so please be careful!
Quantum social science (QSS) is an emerging, interdisciplinary program that brings ideas and math from quantum theory into the social sciences—now making real inroads in international relations (IR). In IR, it’s strongly associated with Alexander Wendt (e.g., Quantum Mind and Social Science) and with Quantum International Relations, co-edited with James Der Derian. Cambridge University Press & AssessmentOxford University PressCarnegie Corporation
Importantly, the term “quantum social science” predates Wendt—notably used by Emmanuel Haven & Andrei Khrennikov to model decisions, finance, and economics via quantum probability. Cambridge University Press & Assessmentassets.cambridge.org
QSS is not the same as quantum psychology: quantum psychology (often called quantum cognition) focuses on cognitive/decision processes using quantum probability; QSS spans broader social phenomena, including IR and diplomacy. jbusemey.pages.iu.eduPubMed
Bottom line: QSS is new but growing fast, with IR taking a clear “quantum turn.” e-ir.info
References (selected): Wendt, Quantum Mind and Social Science (CUP, 2015); Der Derian & Wendt (eds.), Quantum International Relations (OUP, 2022); Haven & Khrennikov, Quantum Social Science (CUP, 2013); Pothos & Busemeyer, “Quantum Cognition” (Annu. Rev. Psych., 2022).
Objective_Row6255
This is a professional social platform. I want to ask u something: according to quantum psychology, crackpots thinks others are crackpots. Lol. So please be respectul. Quantum social sciences is reserved for quantum scientists not crackpots. Guess you know the crackpot.
Objective_Row6255
Please show some respect. Thank you. You can watch the experiment. That would be great, but stop saying things out of your understanding.
Objective_Row6255
https://youtu.be/oljR6S1yBSw?si=QNz17yID7KD3b5uj
This is the first experiment, enabling a speech-disabled woman to speak. There are other experiments there in the channel most of them is neurogame, upload thoughts to broadcast them as virtual realities and games. Happy to respond. If you still care about investing, contact me at [email protected] or [email protected]
Objective_Row6255
Ideally, yes, in the short long term! But now, we only need the picture or a short descriptive story about yourself that you personally wrote, or even a short audio-file. I expect that it will take about 1 year to develop what you are describing.
Objective_Row6255
Hey guys, don't forget to leave a comment.
Objective_Row6255
Please find the live experiment that I have undegone on a mute friend who could not speak for years. She is now using a quantum tech to connect with her social entourage, even while asleep. https://youtu.be/oljR6S1yBSw?si=6qxK601CaUksg5G5. The video is a bit long and not funny, but this is standard experimenration. So I am using the same quantum tech to connect you with artifcial intelligence and artificial intelligence is taking charge of creating your cognitive games.
Objective_Row6255
Hello, how can I call them
While studying the Cicada 3301 Liber Primus, I applied my empirical framework anarchy = 0 to the ciphertext. The interpretation it generated aligned with the already-solved sections of the book. The resulting conceptual key suggests that anarchy = 0 corresponds to self-divinity — or, more precisely, self-sovereignty.