u/Omoikane13
Omoikane13
Omoikane13
Ignoring that this is a low-effort conspiracy theory post, your first two videos are unavailable and your third is 1hr 47min long. Nobody is going to watch that to debate...nothing, you have nothing to debate.
Omoikane13
God is defined as the most perfect being.(than which no greator can be conceived)
Omoikane13
“But I didn’t and still don’t like making a cult of women’s knowledge, preening ourselves on knowing things men don’t know, women’s deep irrational wisdom, women’s instinctive knowledge of Nature, and so on. All that all too often merely reinforces the masculinist idea of women as primitive and inferior – women’s knowledge as elementary, primitive, always down below at the dark roots, while men get to cultivate and own the flowers and crops that come up into the light. But why should women keep talking baby talk while men get to grow up? Why should women feel blindly while men get to think?”
Omoikane13
I won't begrudge DE for making this or players who like this sort of thing for being excited, but if it can't be soloed, I'm not recruiting five other people- I'm just never playing this mode and will basically be treating this as no update. If Narin is locked behind it, I guess I'm waiting for Narin Prime
Omoikane13
Jo Const
Omoikane13
you can learn the principles of...genetics...without reference to evolution
Please, go ahead.
Omoikane13
Maybe scarves are next, so that the first one can be Ichigo-themed again
Omoikane13
What's 1 + 1?
Omoikane13
God is not subject to the law of causality
but he
created causality
and hence caused something.
Omoikane13
everything has a beginning and a cause
And then
He neither begets nor is born
Reads to me as "My god does not exist and has created or caused nothing"
Omoikane13
Even if there's no judgement after we die, I wouldn't lose anything from believing in it
Do you believe people should bother to punish people while alive, even if they're supposedly getting punished in an afterlife? If no, then yes, it does affect you.
Omoikane13
1+1 = 2. It still does, and it always will.
Ring of Integers Modulo 2 who?
Omoikane13
and this encounter would still occur even if religion did not exist.
Evidence for this please
Omoikane13
Scientists don't know much about human brain
How'd you decide it was more complex than a jet engine?
Omoikane13
Scientists don't know much about the human brain
Clearly, you think you know much much more, to declare the brain perfect?
Omoikane13
You just seem to be defensive about being called out for perceived hatred of gays. What you don't seem to have done is actually answer the questions I asked.
Omoikane13
You able to answer any of the questions I asked?
Omoikane13
I have a problem with it because they made the doctor gay to cover up bad writing.
This seems like a baseless claim. It is entirely possible, no, that the character is gay and the writing is bad as two things, does it not?
And by making his personality the fact he is gay, they tried to hide the fact the writing was bad
This is just your previous criticism except you're railing against "gay as a personality" rather than "gay". What exactly is "gay as a personality" to you?
because anyone who says it’s rubbish gets implied to be a bigot. As you have with me.
Weird. I think it's crap, and I'm not a bigot. I've seen lots of people say it's crap, and not get called bigots. It's the ones who do things like wail about the gays that get called bigots. Odd.
EDIT: And as someone who thinks RTD2 was a massive letdown, there were episodes that were very bad well before any sexuality confirmations. Gay was not involved, couldn't really be a shield, and doesn't influence things for plenty of episodes. So what's your excuse there? "Gay personality" being the negative?
Omoikane13
I didn't say that, just that you're doublespeaking and it seems very clear that poor writing (which yes, is true) is a shield for you to rail against the woke scourge.
Omoikane13
I have no issue with the Doctor being gay
You:
Okay I am complaining the Doctor is gay, to cover up terrible writing.
Omoikane13
your statement has neither of those things.
Keep believing that buddy. That's the sort of strength that you'll need.
Omoikane13
Yeah, you're totally right, your complete lack of understanding as to how to make an analogy means it's completely incoherent, and its common usage time and time again is just everyone being so much stupider than you, my lord.
Omoikane13
analogy only works when it highlights a specific shared relationship, structure, or function
Yeah, a sub-population changing not meaning the entire original population gets completely replaced is totally unique.
Omoikane13
You don't know what an analogy even is, clearly.
.
Come on then, do what the post you replied to was saying. Explain your wild assertions and justify them with evidence.