u/Some1-Somewhere

Do you have some pictures?

Why spam?

$1k a month for rent? That's room-in-a-flat territory in a lot of places.

$600-800 a week should get you a place that's good for a couple of kids.

Usually the manufacturers say they want 7kW because people otherwise complain that their car didn't get fully charged fast enough. Consumer rights and fitness for purpose, not electrical safety.

I doubt you'll find that they forbid it or even strongly recommend against it, just say that it may not provide as much charge as customers desire.

The Appendix C method is one of four options for maximum demand calculation; it's not the be-all end-all.

It has an effect on the user's ability to use the installation without nuisance tripping. OP is not experiencing nuisance tripping.

One is an electrical safety and compliance issue.

The other is a question of being able to use the installation for a particular purpose, usually a consumer rights issue.

I think they now have electronic rolls that eliminate most of the causes you're talking about.

The exception is paper enrollment forms that are still in the post or waiting to be processed. Those will be gone in the next few days, after which anyone not on the electronic roll is almost certainly not enrolled.

Colour match from website, colour match from printed flyer, colour match from 'liberated' corflute sign?

FYI it is probably Wellington Free Ambulance, not St John's.

Electric motors and compressors are heavy. Boeing did it because they also moved nearly everything else that relied on compressed air to electric, allowing them to get rid of all the air piping. It's possible they regret it; the 777X was a major major overhaul of the 777 and did not get any significant electrification.

Airbus focused on other changes, including replacing a hydraulic system with electrics (copied from the A380) and a bunch of flight safety improvements.

TME stock a fair bit of stuff. I've bought stuff from there and I'm in NZ.

The daughter is also a woman and in the video.

Aircraft have pressurised cabins because they fly too high for humans to breathe easily - this is why there's oxygen masks; in case the pressurisation fails.

Conventional aircraft take compressed air from the engines (or APU, a small generator in the tail), heat/cool it, filter it, and feed it into the cabins. Jet engines naturally produce compressed air as part of their operation.

While it's fairly rare, there have been issues with engine oil, de-icing fluid, and other contaminants getting into the air supply, usually on the ground. Over the decades, there's been a few fatalities and a contested amount of long-term gradual damage caused by so-called 'fume events'.

The 787 uses electric air compressors then heats/cools and filters it. They should be somewhat less prone to having contaminants leak into the air supply.

It's not something I'd be worried about as a passenger. If I was working for decades on aircraft, I might be more concerned.

So, in late August John got a tin of the exact National blue paint ‒ Resene Endeavour Blue

Journalist is giving people ideas...

If they're under 25t they should be doable on a class 3.

I haven't found a weight spec for them.

Plenty of other countries have similar 50:1 FA rules; none have the CRJ550. This is 95% scope clause.

Looks like Mitre 10 stocks them too.

Yup. Water heater is normally 2-4kW and can run for hours. Very expensive to ignore.

Pictures at this link: https://www.accesscomms.com.au/mains-plug-insulated-pins/

Note the plastic might be white or black or some other colour depending on the design.

Humans almost never pass enough current to trip a breaker/fuse - you need double digit amps. I assume the same is true for cats.

Inverters don't have the peak:average ratio and spare capacity that spinning metal does. Battery is average but PV doesn't have anything left to feed into a short circuit.

It's companies that are burning fuel for process heat, and making electricity as a byproduct.

Some, especially timber/pulp and steel plants, are burning nearly 'free' by-products.

It's the lowest priority to electrify; burning the fuel to produce heat directly is more efficient than burning fuel to make power to produce heat. It only makes sense to move from co-gen if the grid is almost all renewable almost all of the time. We're pretty close to that.

Spillways absorb/dissipate energy from the water, so they tend to need more maintenance and resurfacing if used heavily.

OTOH, wind needs more maintenance with more generation.

Grid stability is also better with more spinning mass which hydro is and wind isn't really.

I noted that I was using the 90C tables. But yes, common practice for us is generally 16A for 2.5mm in domestic, 20A in commercial where there is generally no thermal insulation near cabling.

We would generally have no qualms running 6mm at 32A.

Electrolytic AC caps exist. You may be seeing more pixels than I am if you can see polarity markings.