u/SoundGeekReviews

Nobody says the Romans weren't gay. You seem to have missed the entire point

I think your view is too one-dimensional. I agree with that one-dimension, but it's definitely not the whole story. If you really think the Krishna chant in Naraka is about creating hell through religion..... no man. They obviously give a nod, acknowledging the beauty and divinity in that chant.

Things change as they progress, and I would write my post differently today, but overall I think I am touching on something real. They are not simply dumping on religion and saying that it leads to cults that are destructive. They are most definitely considering the good and the bad, of that I'm sure

Juist goed van zowel Mak als Baudet om dat te doen. Dialoog is precies wat onmogelijk geworden lijkt te zijn (wat de hel premise van het boek is), dus om het gesprek aan te gaan met "de andere kant" is juist dapper.

Maarja het is natuurlijk makkerlijk om "daar geen zuurstof aan te geven" en gewoon lekker in je bubbel te blijven. Op korte termijn werkt het nog ook!

Die kans is wel het grootst ja.

Praat deze situatie uiteraard niet goed, maar laten we nu niet gaan doen alsof we geen misdaadcijfers hebben.

It's impossible to have a reasonable conversation because you claim that I said something that I didn't and you refuse to tell me where I said that.

It's like a double strawman. Normally with a strawman, you make a caricature of someone's position and then engage with the caricature instead of with the actual position. You go a step further: you make a caricature of the position and then you say you are not even going to engage with the caricature because it's beneath you. It's honestly an impressive move. I'd urge you to put your intellect towards truth though, instead of towards lies and deceit. Go read up on Plato and Aristotle and stop being a sophist. You don't seems unintelligent, you just need to become honest

Would you mind backing that up with some actual substance instead of just generic gibberish? Where did I claim that AI art is as valuable as human art?

See, I can point out specific elements where you are being wrong/disingenuous, while you just resort to wild analysis and generic nonsense. I'm find having this conversation like you, but if you can't make it specific it's not possible to have a reasonable conversation. So either get specific or keep repeating how you are right and I am wrong and I'm out.

Ah I just reply to people replying to me. It's really not a big deal. I don't mind the downvotes either. It's much more important to be honest with yourself than to chase validation from tribal strangers on the internet

My god if only you could see how completely wrong you are haha. Your analysis is completely disconnected from reality. You need to get off the internet my friend.

I never said AI art is as valuable as human art. Are you making that up on purpose or is it difficult for you to understand what you are reading?

I don't feel the need to go somewhere else and you are not a spokesperson for this subreddit, so you can deal with it :)

It's funny how even the most braindead comment will get upvoted by the anti-AI crowd. It literally doesn't matter whether it makes sense or not, as long as you are in "the right camp" they will support you. Tribalism....

It's honestly quite bizarre. They don't even get it when you point at their contradictions or childish behavior. I think that might be the reason why they are so militant. For us, AI is a tool, for them, it's a treat.

Yeah that's a word. Please tell me you are a native speaker. I am not

So instead of being able to discuss the topic, you resort to tribal laughing. Read my comment again and see how you proved my point on 2 counts with that last comment.

"Oh wowwwwww that's sooooooo impressive! I bet your fingers got super tired after all that typing! You're a completely real artist and your "creations" have actual merit! We're all so very proud of you!"

You very much did

What supposed lie are you referring to? That nowadays people heavily rely on AI for things like posters?

🤝

First of all, fully agree with that.

But now im curious, did you downvote the post? :p

You are the only one thinking this is some match where people make "comebacks". The rest is just discussing the appropriate use of AI on the sub. Or actually, seems like the anti-AI people aren't capable of that. You guys are all just trying to "win". It's so childish and the emotional disregularion shows in the quality of your arguments

For tasks like making a poster of your favorite artist? I bet the far majority will be made by AI these days. Its just how it is.

And regarding accuracy, if you know what you are doing like me (programmed NNs myself) the results are actually very accurate.

I never used AI to make a poster. Im just calling out the haters like yourself

Try Fever Ray perhaps?

Nah it's actually a completely accurate thing to say. And saying it's disrespecting is an insane thing to say

It usually takes many prompts to get the result you like. Then you still need to get it printer somewhere , get it shipped or picked up. "Some effort" is very accurate and ill stand by it

They said they would only sell it until release date. Was that a lie?

I said "some effort". And you need some effort because BoC posters dont come falling from the sky, even with AI

You are almost certainly right haha