u/Sravdar

Cars CAN system is physically protected. But did you know elevators also use can system? And in easily accessible in public space.

Anyone can unscrew cop or lop panel and place wireless capable middle man in CAN system. Now they have remote control over most things.

CRA doesn't say do this or that. But says safety by design. In your risk analysis you can say encryption with authentication is not possible in can system and doesn't effect critical safety (which almost what everyone will do).

But thing is no body know yet. No body wanna spend time and money redesigning their whole system and no body wanna first person to be sanctioned from CRA.

Not sure if I understood. Are you trying to solve a problem of embedded systems or solve a problem via embedded systems?

If first one, check EU CRA. It is absolute headache. For example encryption and authenticaton of Can-cc networks is really hard if not impossible (while maintaining good data rate).

If second one, it is easier but good luck finding a unsolved problem.

I do understand people that steal in real life, cheat in exams etc. But cheating in a game? What the fuck are you trying to achieve? Why bother playing games at that point?

Only thing that make sense is account buyers (and RMT) make it possible to earn money so cheating becomes useful. So fuck you all who do RMT as well.

"same feel as native" is a programmer lie. Never heard a single user who complains about "native feel".

You don't need a native app for chess. In fact, you don't need native app for most apps. Flutter is performant enough for nearly everything.

Even with AI, maintaining a separate codebase for each platform means doing the same work over and over. Flutter takes care of that so you can focus on features.

I say this as someone who has used Flutter on almost every platform (Android, iOS, Windows, Linux, web, and embedded) for the last three years. It has never let me down.

Libreoffice is absolute dog shit. Anyone says otherwise never used it for professional work or biased libreoffice dev. I normally have huge respect for open-source devs but libreoffice is piece of shit that doesn't work properly but works enough to make my managers believe it is enough for us and push us to use it instead of buying office license (while they use office themselves).

Writing this this as i am dealing with shitty libreoffice issues for past 6 hours.

Marka model önerin olursa incelerim.

Ben bu havda bile üşüyorum. Baharda ve kışta için hem üşümeyip hem terlememek için nasıl giyinmek gerek çözemedim henüz.

I would say tbate is awesome story that starts smillar and evolves into something else. But right now I feel writers lost the audience. To much babling, internal thoughts, story dragging...

For example I read today's chapter and felt nothing. That's how much i started to feel detached.

I am using flutter for smillar purposes (kiosk app, embedded flutter etc) and can say it works amazing.

But you said you had zero coding experience and this brings bigger problems than framework choice.

Where this will app run? x64 windows? Linux? Arm64? Android?

What are requirements? Just touchscreen interface with internet connection? Physical can buss or uart communication? Playing videos 7/24? Safety critical? Medical?

Thanks to Flutter's portability platform choice doesn't matter but there are still serious design choices needs to be made. AI can't make this design choices properly.

This might be not something you can handle with zero coding experience. Consider getting professional help depending on requirements.

Only solution is active moderation.

Jokes on you. Most companies that don't use Ai don't make reviews as well. If they used AI I am %100 sure their code and product quality would increase. Don't ask how I know...

Not disable but make it drastically shorter I would say

O da red flag. Çok yaklaşmamak gerek bu firmalara.

Absol already devastate planes enough. I think this change would be unnecessary. There are much important subjects to focus on.

It was escorted. Fighter crash landed at start of the fight. Harpy has shitty CAS capability atm. Might have good potential for bomber hunting but haven't tested yet.

We took this fight to test harpy in dogfight. It turned out bad as expected.

You sure you killed LT? Even killing a logi truck takes around 5 dive. I wonder how many it would take to kill a LT.

Your comprasions doesnt make sense.

It doesnt matter if it has more parts. When you get hit, you get hit in burst in same place. Harpy parts have much much larger hitbox than fighters, making it even easier to hit same place. And top of that having some parts damaged making this plane unflyable, making your survivability a joke.

Also my main point is not it being slow. It is slow on top of everything, making this plane useless.

Harbringer is a mainly fighter plane. It is supposed to be fast. This plane is supposed to be CAS. But when everything stacked up: poor damage, low fire rate, low hp, slow maneuver, high dive speeds, unreliable flying phsyichs when damaged; making this plane useless.

Not saying everything i said needs to be fixed but unless this plane has some strong sides no one will play this plane after this update.

Also i have been flying planes non stop ever since they are introduced in devbranch. Some part damages doesn't make harpy hard to fly, it makes it impossible to fly.

Also it is clear you have no idea how this plane flys, you cant hit ground properly while circling.

You make assumptions, i speak from testing in real scenarios.

I deffinetly agree.

I have to disagree. Right now nothing is good about this plane.

• Massive hitbox with poor hp
• Slow
• Bad damage to enemy vehicles
• Hard to hit infantry with high dive speed and low fire rate
• Slow turret
• And no matter what you do some part damages make this plane uncontrollable.

It might be somewhat good for cutting logi but considering what you risk that usage doesn't make any sense.

It doesn't do any damage to ground. There is nothing good about this plane.

We lost another plane in safe spot due to single damaged part. It really becomes uncontrollable when some parts are damaged. Might post that video later on.

Personally I will not order any more production of Harpy. Absolutely useless. Check my comments in my profile for more info.

I am the pilot of that plane.

I lost 20m instantly while turning. When any part of harpy is damaged it is destined to fall down. It becomes uncontrollable.

IMO harpy needs hp buff since it has massive hitbox. There is no way you don't get hit it.

Also flying with damaged part needs to be reworked. When some parts are damaged it is impossible control this plane.

Aligns with my experience. It is bad. Things i would add or change on what you said:
* Absolutely useless against armored vehicles, little to no damage.
* Absolutely useless against enemy infantry. Too low primary fire rate, turret might get 1-2 kills on risky dives.
* Dives are too fast and risky. This thing needs air-break.
* Model is huge and health of plane doesn't match it. Any aa fire hits the plane. It only takes one aa-tank or emplaced-aa to rip off a part.
* Having some parts damaged makes it unflyable and you crash. Not specifying to not cause intel leak.
* Somehow effective against logi trucks but really doesn't make sense when you consider what you are risking.

Also didn't had chance to fight against fighters but with this model size and health i don't have much hope.

I have only highlights of nothing happening or crashing.

Pretty bad plane atm. Need buff to health and damage.