u/TheTechAccount

This is not true, and has never been the case. Google tends to lowball, but they can match any offer they deem comes from a "comparable" company. They will match any Meta offer 100%.

Amazon pays quite well (with very few perks), but Meta and Google still blow its socks off in terms of TC. I was at a leadership position at 2 of the 3 of these and did a lot of hiring. Amazon cannot (or will not, really) compete with the other two.

Look, I genuinely wish you the best, but I think you should be realistic here. Most bootcamps (even through University) don't have any kind of accreditation, you have to hope you picked a good one. Either way, you are not going to be able to cram 4 years worth of study into 6 weeks.

In 3 units, I've built 3 different websites/ applications including MERN stacks and full CRUD applications.

That's awesome, and very applicable to get a fullstack developer gig. But keep in mind this is a very small piece of a very large field. Most bootcamps are not going to cover algorithms, data structures, distributed systems, programming abstractions, operating systems, etc.

I think bootcamps can certainly be an excellent ROI, and I hope that shakes out for you. Having said that, it will be nowhere close to the breadth or depth of a formal education, and you should know your blind spots going into it.

I think a bootcamp is a good tradeoff in terms of time and money, but you're deluding yourself if you think it is the same as 4+ years at an accredited University.

I'll go ahead and take his word for it considering he's done it, is in the industry and has worked side by side with bootcamp grads.

I say go for it, but there are a lot of other experienced people that will tell you otherwise. I have only worked in FAANG-type companies, and did a lot of recruiting. I have only seen maybe 2 bootcamp grads even pass the interviews, and they didn't stick around long.

and a college course is what, an hour or two a day, maybe two or three days a week?

Spoken like someone who hasn't been to college. The rest of the time is doing homework, working on projects, and studying for tests. You don't just go to class a couple hours per day and chill the rest.

In two weeks, we've gone through an entire semester of information or more.

This is so out of touch. In a single college course in one semester you generally work through a college-level textbook. Add to that all of the tests, quizzes, homework, and projects to reinforce that knowledge. You aren't getting anywhere to close to that in two weeks, you couldn't even read all of the content in that period.

Most people who don’t want to work at Amazon have never worked at Amazon lol

What does that matter? A big portion of programmers don't want to work there. Also the majority of people have not worked there, as that would be impossible. I worked at Amazon (for far too long) and I will never work there again, so plus one to the group that worked there and also don't want to work there.

Look at the spreadsheet, it has all budgets, including high-end. The first line literally has Kiton, Oxxford, etc.

Point to one?

Why are you so stuck on this "boss man bad" nonsense. Literally nobody is saying that. It seems odd that you keep sticking up for this random person we don't know as if we are personally slighting him.

So your boss does make your budget or does not?

My boss does not control my salary. He literally has been working with hr for MONTHS to get me this raise.

The irony.

I think you've already managed it at your current salary!

Where did anyone say your boss is the Antichrist?

How do you keep mistaking "your employer" with "your boss"?

"Am I out of touch? No, it's the children who are wrong!"

Nobody knows or cares about your boss, the sentiment in the post wasn't even hostile towards them. You are not going to convince the internet that some person we've never met is a good dude because you keep posting "boss bad" over and over.

There's not antiwork mindset at play (whatever that means), you're just underpaid and this post is further highlighting that. Imagine what a 60% pay raise would look like if you had a semi-decent wage to begin with.

I think I know why people throw around the word "copium" now.

Warning: turn back now, OP is not listening to anyone and spouting nonsense. These comments will only frustrate you.

Amazing work! I've often thought about this, truly a great writeup.

There are over 7000 human studies on pubmed. You're telling me none of those are done by a serious organization or government?

you do realize any company is free to do any trial it wishes to do with any results it can produce without obligation to absolutely verify results to a major government or serious organization that can protect human health?

I do, as does almost every person on this subreddit.

There are some human studies listed on examine:

https://examine.com/supplements/berberine/

So everything is not done. You're agreeing with the comment you replied to.

That's pretty significant though, right? A pill that is equivalent to negating that amount of glycemic load seems huge (although I get your point!).

"What he has got to hide" - I heard her say.

Yeah, so I don't think using WhatsApp is what made her think you were crazy...

Fuck normies believing the illuminati

Bruh

Mouse - Logitech MX Anywhere 3

I think it was supposed to be "Mouse - Logitech MX Anywhere 3"

Showing off is not being brave, being modest is not being scared.

Haha, my bad. Saw it was around 200 in 2019 and 2k now, was thinking 10x. Will edit.

Username checks out.

That's probably an overly-broad statement. I think people can have crypto as a portion of an intelligent portfolio. Like anything, you have to understand your risk tolerance and how much of your portfolio should be made up of assets with that risk. BTC is still 30k today and ETH is 2k, which is an insane return from a couple years ago.

Full disclosure: I do not hold crypto or necessarily recommend it, but know lots of very successful people that do as a small portion of net worth.

Based on the current market, if you accepted a Senior Developer Google offer exactly 1 year ago, you'd be making about $350k a year, on average, this year. That is if the stock does not increase at all for the rest of the year, and not accounting for refreshers (that take into account the current market price). Still doing pretty good. It could get much worse though, of course...

Edit: I'm interested in any source you have for dot-com burst era salary data. I think the market is much different today, but it's fascinating to compare the two. I think if the economy tanks further, the most notable result will be temporary hiring freezes and decreases in VC funding. That second part may not be all bad.