u/TwistedBrother

1.5% is an issue but it’s a manageable one imho. It happens. It was probably this way for hundreds of years in English history though the other languages would have been French or German.

Please please change your prompt.

These are good books and terrible insincere summaries.

I don’t think so. The rhetorical power of that add comes from its association with gas chambers in WWII. The counterfactual is if that didn’t happen in WII would this still be a viable ad? and I think the answer is no, it wouldn’t make nearly as much sense as messaging even if it is factually accurate in many circumstances.

For example, not all animals are gassed. Some are slaughtered Halal (which might even be worse but I digress).

Now my previous comment in another thread was defending free speech for a Palestinian advocate. I’m not here to simp for ADL or whomever, but it’s wilfully ignoring context to suggest that the association with WWII played an insignificant part in the choice of phrasing here.

While someone might give a list that’s concrete, the broad answer is he takes strong opinions that feel good but are like the tip of a complex iceberg.

Then when questioned about these opinions, whether domestic (policing, NHS) or international (Middle East, Ukraine), his own stance melts under any questioning.

It’s like watching someone with too much confidence and not enough self-doubt make assertions on a topic where even experts don’t have easy answers.

Bad faith means one side gets to make stuff up?

Really? I mean look at those statistics shall we?

Gradual Long-Term Decline

ONS data tracking a comparable time-series (adults aged 16 to 59) reveals a gradual long-term decrease in overall domestic abuse prevalence over the decade, falling from 6.5% in the year ending March 2014 to 5.4% in recent years.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/domesticabuseinenglandandwalesoverview/november2024

Yet, more women are subject to online harms. But the trend in person is a steady decline and some of the world’s lowest rates. Also reporting is up while that hasn’t led to an increase in recorded harms but more people feeling comfortable sharing (as well as a general lowering of the bar for what counts as worth going to the police (a good thing, it shouldn’t just be violent sexual assault).

I would recommend advise you to find sources that contradict your world view periodically and consider how offline life is getting safer while online life isn’t necessarily.

Called it Judea. That’s apparently where Jew comes from.

…so riddle me this, where do Palestinians come from exactly?

Nah mate, the way you said "Punishment" reads like an endorsement, intended or not. Prison itself is the punishment. People who want to see extra curricular prison rape for the undesirables raises a sadistic red flag for me.

Now you’re just asking how to do heroin.

It’s amazing to see what a pro can do with this tech.

Just bounced from a thread where an idiot complained Gemini couldn’t extract text from his shitty prompt. People were like it’s no good if you can’t actually prompt what you’re doing.

Then to see this: holy shit. This is what we should be looking to see. Real skill plus not in opposition to AI.

Also, I want this film.

Maybe not “just as powerful” but the point is it doesn’t need to prove Fermat’s Last Theorem. It needs to work and for a huge number of tasks it’s good enough.

It’s also far, far smaller.