u/Upbeat_Push_157

Prove me wrong. You're a nobody trying to prey on gullible people, and you can't even afford a domain. Period. You might have more luck if you were more humble and asked for donations so you could afford a meal tonight.

But know that I won't send you a cent since you're being a jerk. No dinner for you, my friend.

1 This still doesn't make any sense at all. You can track whether the traffic comes from a human or a bot, whether it came from Google, ChatGPT, or Narnia. Just use dimensions. That's what they're for.

2 You should have tried the other sources or AI assistant (see screenshot). Just in case, the second link I see https://dorve.com/blog/marketing-blog/ai-traffic-in-ga4/ explains how to track AI traffic in GA4 in a very detailed way, step by step, same goes for the videos

https://preview.redd.it/8tgz3br9mbuh1.png?width=831&format=png&auto=webp&s=c2e67bffead8245aa814eb9f9ad2bf39a78b1f6b

Unless you think everybody (including Google) is incorrect, I hope you'll agree tracking AI traffic not only is possible, it's actually very easy.

3 Your meme doesn't mention this at all (oh boy you're arguing over a meme!) but since we are at it: AI shopping assistants actually send the referring link. I just asked Google, hopefully they're correct

Seriously, you can continue trying to defend a meme til cows come home, but really, two seconds of using Google are enough to prove it's really stupid and inaccurate.Oh, and btw, it's a meme, hopefully I didn't hurt its feelings

His name is Ea-nāṣir

well, this sub doesn't allow links, so look for teh answer at r / postSEO , I made the same question and got the perfect answer: no magic tools, no scams, just your GA4 account. And it works like a charm.

Additionally, you can use Clarity, but it's less than 5% of the traffic, so forget about the other 95%. I'd probably mix both for a better lecture

I asked the same a few days ago and actually got the only real answer (as in no magic tools or scams, just GA4) https://www.reddit.com/r/PostSEO/comments/1wqy5yo/comment/pcwzokv/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

La K en tu nick es por Karen?

Some AI slop with no sense at all?

AI;DR

I don't get it, this is correct (I'm a native Spanish speaker)

Based on how badly is that bun cut out, and how weird the perspective looks, I'd argue this is lousy Photoshop

just stop it you f*cking idiot

https://preview.redd.it/6u6tdr6tzylh1.png?width=750&format=png&auto=webp&s=4ead46d64154adc8fb75c14de4b6a3f7766c1b25

Personally, I think everybody should be Roman by now, less problems

YMYL and AI together don't seem like a good combo. Add scaled content to that, and you're basically hitting all of Google's no-nos. Your "no JS" strategy looks borderline cloaking, but I still think it's the mass-scaled content, it's clearly mentioned in Google's Webmaster Guidelines so that's almost a given

While the traffic numbers look good, both sites have lost two-thirds of their traffic over the past year and remain on a downward trend.

I still would love that kind of traffic, but it seems they're being hit hard

oh boy the Connectively/HARO requests are getting out of hand

First time I have heard of him. It's actually Mexican, but yes, quite a moron

You may want to read this: https://flamine.com/aeo/entity-maps-okf-and-llms-new-ai-markdown-formats/ . It's a research study on new AI-oriented Markdown formats. Whether you use them or not depends on your specific case, as there are some important distinctions. In general, no, you don't need to use it.

there's no way you can track prompts, it's effing impossible, GenAI 101. You can measure traffic from LLMs tho, but that's a different story

Spain only? It happens in several European countries, as well as probably all LATAM countries and many cities in US, Los Angeles and Sacto are full of them, same for some parts of NYC and New Jersey.

I don't know, but I'd try cleaning the code a bit, it's a complete mess and it takes a lot of time to load. Maybe in that mess you have some error that prevents the page to be rendered, or it simply times out. Pagespeed loads your page just fine, so it could also be a GSC glitch because doing a search using site: operator your pages are listed

Bollocks. Whoever said that has no idea how Google, or any computational system for that matter, works.

Google doesn't crawl a website by opening a folder, then a subfolder, then another subfolder, and so on until it eventually gives up. That's not how the web works. In fact, most eCommerce platforms don't even use real folders. Their pages are generated dynamically from a database, and the path structure is largely cosmetic. The "levels" exist for organization and usability, not because they correspond to a physical directory tree.

Plenty of major websites use URLs filled with IDs, hashes, random strings, or other opaque parameters. You can do exactly the same thing in WordPress by using IDs instead of pretty permalinks. Search engines don't care.

What Google actually does is discover, crawl, and index pages. If a page has no incoming links and isn't included in a sitemap, Google may never find it, whether it's at level 1 or level 10,000. Conversely, if a page is discoverable through links, Google can crawl and index it regardless of how many segments appear in the path.

For example, a page located at men/shirts/pink/summer/whatever/whatnot/ohyeah/ is not inherently harder for Google to index than one at shirts/. If Google can reach it through links, it can crawl it. If it can't reach it, the depth is irrelevant because the page won't be discovered in the first place.

URL depth is one of those SEO myths that survives because it sounds intuitive, not because it reflects how search engines actually work.

If you don't believe it, just do a search for pink shirt for men long sleeves and you will find mostly pages with obscure IDs or something like https://www.macys.com/shop/mens/clothing/shirts/Color_normal,Top_style/Pink,T-Shirt?id=20626

it seems your graph is missing a whole entire month between the two periods

los judíos dudo mucho, pero sí, ojalá que estemos todos. Los chorros se pueden quedar en Balcarce al 50

naaa, con Excursio no se jode!