u/WindFreaker

Stop recommended anything Arch-based to beginners. 9 times out of 10 they will be frustrated and give up before the end of the week.

Any reason this isn't mentioned on the website yet? I only see a link to download the bundled binary.

Flatpak ≠ Flathub. You can package it as an installable binary, or even host your own remote repository.

Incredibly biased opinion here but I'd think hosting your own repository would even be better than uploading to Flathub. You would have all the benefits of using Flatpaks as a package format while keeping 100% control over the distribution process. Flathub's process can be too controlling and demanding.

Any plans to package the Linux version as a flatpak in the future?

She literally used forcefields to deprive a campfire of oxygen in the first movie.

If you absolutely must expose a service publicly (like for a public website), route it through a reverse proxy (Nginx, Caddy, Traefik) and force multi-factor authentication (MFA) or an identity provider (like Authelia, Authentik or PocketID) in front of it. 

Not "if you must", that's the best way to self-host pretty much everything.

Looks really pretty, gonna check it out!

This doesn't outlaw magsafe or any other properietary connectors. It just requires the USB-C ports can change the device as well.

I think this highlights a broad issue about all app stores that should be discussed. How many hoops of trust must an end user jump through to feel safe in some product / app?

The way Flathub works basically forces you the user to trust in the Flathub maintainers. They are the final authority on nearly all of the apps published through their repository. They want your trust to be placed in them, not in the people writing the code behind your favorite pieces of software. They have even openly stated they will takeover and maintain the app's Flatpak manifest and build process if the developer(s) behind the project disappear.

I see this as an issue, not just for Flathub but ultimately all app stores. When downloading an app from Flathub (especially those marked as verified) most users are under the assumption it is coming directly from the app's developers which is objectively not true. There is an entire layer of the process we are forgetting about.

It's my opinion that the fewer organizations and people you have to trust to feel confident in the distribution of your favorite apps the better. If the entire process from source code to executable can be controlled by the project's maintainer's then that is much more secure and trustworthy than having Flathub itself have the final say in things.

I think the entire FOSS community should take notes from projects like the Dolphin Emulator which operates their own Flatpak repository. This way your trust can be completely placed in the app's developers and their long standing record of reproducible safe builds. Distributing single-file bundles is possible too, avoiding maintaining a repository altogether.

The bottom line is you should not place trust in the distributors of software. They cannot possibly verify the safety of every single package being offered to download. Even profit-driven corporations as big as Google let malware through the cracks, and I'm sure Flathub is no different. They want you to trust them implicitly but you shouldn't. Simply trust the people behind your favorite apps instead.

Make the trapdoor open in a way that covers the redstone instead.

I got the RZ717 as an upgrade to my Framework laptop and so far I've had no issues with it. Fair warning though I will be honest I'm not really technically savvy enough to know if it does have any issues past the "can I ping Google" test.

Yes it is safe. Download it from Flathub.

You appear to have an older controller that doesn't have Bluetooth support. Old Xbox One controllers only use RF and require a dongle. Sorry.

https://www.reddit.com/r/xboxone/comments/5fr7r1/easy_way_to_tell_if_a_controller_supports/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Just use Prism Launcher?

The OS would need to support passkeys I believe. Other than iOS and Android I don't know what platforms that would be.

All of those complaints were fixed before I was blocked. Check the timeline and when I submitted fixes.

Can you elaborate on why you want to disable IPv6? Just because that website can report your IPv6 address doesn't mean it's something to worry about. There is nothing inherently dangerous about websites seeing you IP address, v4 or v6.

You know what I miss? Back when each tab showed up independently in Android's recents menu. Something about that method of browser navigation was refreshing.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fedora/comments/1kzyr9l/warning_critical_bug_in_gnomes_mutter_483_breaks/

Its entirely up to you and whatever works best for your mind. Obsidian gives you many tools and instead of forcing yourself to use them experiment and see what you like.

From a security standpoint its not a good idea to import your existing keys. It is much safer to create new keys and migrate all of your existing servers over to the new keys.

However, if you absolutely need to use your existing keys there is a "Import key from clipboard" button.

I might be the only person actually happy with Samsung's implementation in OneUI 7. I personally like it and for those that don't it's completely optional. Glad to see Google doing something similar.

Why are your screenshots AI upscaled? It looks unnerving.

This is really cool and useful but it should be a website and not an app.