u/ZenPyx

Just because something is true in arithmetic, it doesn't mean it's true in a sociological setting

I dread to think what you'd actually consider the denominators of people - intelligence? exposure to media? some sort of abstract taste metric?

Why use fractions to describe it, when there are thousands of other mathematical functions? It's all very arbitrary and bullshit

Ryanair were only able to do this because of socialised government subsidies that are no longer available.

How does the free market cope with that?

>he needs to offer millions of people a quality of life improvement

Using their tax money to subsidise his business

I mean this might not be true. They've certainly removed some of the surface from the copper element, but this almost always happens if you frequently descale. If you wash it through a few times with water and it comes out clear, it should be totally fine

See the link below where people talk about this exact situation
https://www.home-barista.com/repairs/blue-water-after-descaling-t52941.html

>you're clearly barely literate

Nice one pal. Any other playground insults? Call me a poopyhead?

God seriously man this is pathetic.

>Use your big boy words and tell the class exactly how I accused anyone of anything.

Who the fuck do you think you are, pal?

>you're desperately clawing at any grammatical error to sound relevant.

I'm pointing out how you claim to have some superior intelligence, and yet can't even spell and don't know the definition of words you use

Have a good night pal. Hope you can find something less sad to do with your life.

I "freaked out" because you implied people were, and I specifically quote you here, "epstein weird" for being attracted to short adult women.

I think you are projecting to be honest pal. Stones and glass houses and all that.

>Your not arguing youre puking out random emotion.

It's "you're". You did get it right the second time, so at least there's that. As you might say, "If you lack the intelligence to do so... shut up"

verbiage

/ˈvəːbiɪdʒ/

Verbiage means speech or writing that uses too many words or overly complicated language, often making it difficult to understand

I'm not going to engage with someone who calls everyone an idiot and yet uses big words incorrectly to try and make themselves sound smart

>Where did I call anybody epstien?

>Like epstein weird.

Buddy how can you not understand your own comment?

Can you explain what exactly you meant by "Epstein weird" if it wasn't calling people pedos for dating shorter women?

Sure, but this clearly isn't what most people do, because a lot more people invest 500k into a house than into the stock market.

It's clear that even indexes still open you up to a lot of short term risk, particularly if you actually intend to live off the income (good luck when your investment drops 40% with the next financial crash and you have to take another 10% out to pay the bills)

Wow at 6'8 I don't date women under 5'8 anymore. Anything under that feels "weird".

Like epstein weird.

>you just don't have reading comprehension skills.

LMAO

>it's not an accusation in any way.

>Calls people Epstein for dating a 5'7" woman

Okay pal

>Some men have a fetish for short women

I would describe this as a preference, rather than a fetish

It's a bit like saying you have a fetish for blondes

I think it's pretty weird to say there is anything childlike about a slightly shorter than average adult (or, I mean, in the case of a 5'8" woman, above average height)

It's fine to have a preference for a taller partner, but like... it's a bit odd to imply that someone else dating a consenting adult is a bad thing because she's not up to your height requirements

>As stated in this article, these images are class B - "Category B: Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity."

Literally just fucking read, dude

>I don't get enjoyment from such images, so I don't have them. But I don't have a problem with people who do, as long as they don't actually abuse children.

You are a pedophile apologist. Demand for these images lead to their continued creation.

Frankly, if I knew who you were, I would probably inform the police that you almost certainly have these kinds of images on your PC.

>You are one of those who thinks she should go to jail but the rapist asylem seekers should be given free housing that is located next to a school.

Deflection, so keen to place the blame on immigrants when you yourself are defending actual pedophiles.

The more you apologise for her abuse of children, the more I am absolutely certain that you are also in possession of these kinds of images, or worse.

>I want to bring back the death penalty for them.

Be careful what you wish for

Nobody has ever been charged for photos of their kid in the bath.

As stated in this article, these images are class B - "Category B: Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity."

Will you stop being an apologist for sexual predators now?

>Like how is this even a crime?

How are images of child sexual abuse a crime? I think you might need to do some self-reflecting on this one pal

>we didn't tell Germans that their country is no longer allowed to exist.

We absolutely did lmao. What do you think East and West Germany were?

There isn't really a strong consensus on the origin. There are a few reasonable theories, one of which includes the accidental release of a natural virus.

Hell, the former (during COVID) CDC director, Robert Redfield, believes that there is insufficient evidence for the zoonotic origin theory, and that accidental release of a virus might explain that (https://edition.cnn.com/videos/health/2021/03/26/sanjay-gupta-exclusive-robert-redfield-coronavirus-opinion-origin-sot-intv-newday-vpx.cnn)

I think it's crazy to imagine that there is no chance for a novel coronavirus to have come from the exact street in china where a novel coronavirus research institute is located and for there to be no connection. It's unscientific to rule something like that out without stronger evidence for the bat-based origin

We don't allow China to fly bombing missions from our airbases, do we?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement

The Nazi party in the 1930s supported the formation of a Zionist state. Hitler literally supported the formation of a Jewish ethnostate (and specifically, Israel)

Could it be that Burnham and the left-wing shift of the Labour party has pushed some people away from the Greens? No, it must be that everyone loves Israel!

A lot of psychology papers posted to this subreddit are from very unreputable journals as well (like psypost) that will sensationalise the most low-quality research into huge sweeping claims

This paper has an n of 96, average age for men of 30.7 and women at 60, and asks people to rank 60 professions.

Assuming we can draw any sort of inference from such a small and asymmetric pool is frankly ridiculous

Stella F. Lourenco, the author, doesn't even work in this area of psychology - she mostly works in vision and development

>Rich people (who are more likely to be white) are leaving Birmingham because it's a shit place to live

>This is somehow the fault of the people who don't leave

What the hell?

I saw someone saying Brixton and Hackney were no-go zones in London recently.

Spoken like someone from Norfolk whose last time in the big city was back in 1995