u/__Tenacious___
-
3points
-
4points
If your AGI definition excludes most humans, it sucks. (lesswrong.com) [Educational Purpose Only ]
-
56points
If your AGI definition excludes most humans, it sucks. (lesswrong.com)
-
0points
Nobody is Doing AI Benchmarking Right (self.artificial) [Discussion]
-
1points
Nobody is Doing AI Benchmarking Right (self.ChatGPT) [Educational Purpose Only ]
-
0points
You have nothing and 24 turns. Can you survive the incoming bandits? (i.redd.it) [Developer Diary]
-
5points
Nasty, Brutish, and Long: Now in Demo (i.redd.it) [DevPost]
-
2points
You can predict someone's male or female with ~90% accuracy from MBTI and Big 5 traits. I have evidence. (self.mbti) [MBTI Article Link]
-
2points
-
2points
You can predict someone's male or female with ~90% accuracy from MBTI and Big 5 traits. I have evidence. (self.mbti) [MBTI Article Link]
-
73points
-
32points
Think you could survive a zombie apocalypse? (self.UPenn) [Social]
-
5points
Halloween Humans vs. Zombies (self.UPenn) [Social]
-
19points
Around over fall break? Think you could survive a zombie apocalypse? (self.UPenn) [Social]
-
48points
Where do you expect foam blaster technology to be in 5 years? (self.Nerf) [Discussion/Theory]
-
6points
How would you fare in a zombie apocalypse? (self.UPenn) [Social]
-
7points
Think you could survive a zombie apocalypse? (Or take out all the humans?) (self.UPenn) [Social]
__Tenacious___
__Tenacious___
I agree that the key requirement for AGI is being able to do novel reasoning, which is very similar to what you're describing. The trouble is that average humans are only mediocre at doing that stuff. Contrary to most definitions that require that ability to do anything any human can do, something that can match that mediocre average-human level at novel human reasoning should count as AGI.
The argument that AGI would surpass human-level intelligence simply by virtue of having massive knowledge and prefect data isn't borne out by observations. Current baby AGIs have that prefect recall of a vast amount of data, but are still firmly within the middle of the human intelligence range.
__Tenacious___
Yes. I meant ignoring the A, which I figured was clear enough to not bother to write.
__Tenacious___
ARC-AGI is nonsense. They do a ton of deceptive reporting, plus their tasks depend heavily upon perception (as you suggest) and other faculties at the expense of reasoning.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/aFW63qvHxDxg3J8ks/nobody-is-doing-ai-benchmarking-right
__Tenacious___
Yeah, the game's open to everyone. Just show up at Weightman at 8 tonight.
__Tenacious___
Riepe entrance used to be the one to use, but the current quad renovations mean it's inaccessible (unless one has tunnel access anyway). One can go into McCleand via the right door, walk to the package room door, turn right, and a good samaritan left duct tape on the door leading into the tunnels at the end of that hall.
__Tenacious___
It's over now, but you can join our discord to hear about a future season when that happens.
__Tenacious___
No. We've had two games in there since the email without issue, and our regular games will still be there. We're doing Penn Park for our Halloween special game.
For those who don't know what this is about and are curious, our discord explains it all: https://discord.gg/8FcjPHanrG
👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Vote Yea.