u/abstractanus
- 10points
- 217points
- 17points
- 9points
-
2points
Animation of a light wave stretched to twice its length by expansion (1 + z = 2), from a film I made (v.redd.it) [Astro Art (OC)]
- 14points
-
73points
Why the Most Distant Galaxies Look Bigger (youtube.com)
- 302points
-
60points
Luminous light-cone shell rendered in Blender for a cosmology film I made (v.redd.it) [Original Content Showcase]
- 11points
-
9points
What ladder operators add to the quantum oscillator's eigenvalue problem (self.LinearAlgebra)
- 1points
- 6points
-
2points
A predict-before-watching prompt for a quantum-oscillator animation (self.physicseducation)
- 2points
-
4points
Why the quantum oscillator has discrete energies: two animated derivations (self.learnphysics)
- 2points
abstractanus
abstractanus
I made this luminous shell in Blender for a 12-minute film. It is our past light cone drawn in proper distance against cosmic time, which gives it the teardrop shape.
The rest of the film uses my custom Python renderer (NumPy, OpenCV, Pillow), with the edit in DaVinci Resolve.
Full film, with the story around this shape: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XTHyWVwHVY
abstractanus
Check it out! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XTHyWVwHVY&t=100s
abstractanus
Thanks! On the density, the distinction is between a single energy eigenstate and a superposition. For a time-independent Hamiltonian, one energy eigenstate gains an overall phase, but its position probability density stays fixed. In the particular ground-state/first-excited-state superposition shown in the video, the changing relative phase makes the density move. That contrast is what the animation is meant to make visible.
abstractanus
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it.
abstractanus
For a concrete oscillator example of the weight-function step in your comment, take hbar = m = omega = 1. Starting from
-(1/2) psi''(x) + (1/2) x^2 psi(x) = E psi(x),
and writing psi(x) = exp(-x^2/2) y(x), the equation becomes
y''(x) - 2x y'(x) + (2E - 1)y(x) = 0.
The Hermite-polynomial solutions then give E = n + 1/2. Their orthogonality with weight exp(-x^2) becomes ordinary wavefunction orthogonality after absorbing the square root of that weight. It is a useful place to make the change of inner product explicit. Boundary conditions and operator domains still matter; matching formal differential expressions alone does not determine the spectrum.
I recently made an animation of this standard oscillator example, including the power-series and ladder-operator derivations and the resulting state evolution: https://youtu.be/7_DcdXVh5mc (my video, about 13 minutes). The visual connection may be useful for readers coming to the differential-equation formulation from linear algebra.
abstractanus
Thanks! That’s fair on the music, I’ll probably dial it back a bit in future videos. And nope, it isn’t AI-generated. I made the animations in Manim. Appreciate you watching and giving feedback!
abstractanus
Thank you!! Really glad that came across - that was one of my favorite parts to animate
Thank you!