u/archgabriel33

3,055 post karma · 6,181 comment karma · joined Aug 2018

archgabriel33

won't you be too dead to care at that point?

archgabriel33

What was is Britain involved in? 👀

archgabriel33

No, it's not. That's just what people who don't know history like to say on the Internet so as to sound smarter than others.

archgabriel33

Yes.

archgabriel33

English please

archgabriel33

Because of the East Pakistan genocide.

archgabriel33

Yes, Pakistan is based on ethnic and racial superiority. Should've made that clear.

archgabriel33

Indian Partition, Hindu supremacy, East Pakistan genocide etc etc etc. All the three countries are ethno-states or/and some other form of religious/racial supremacist state.

archgabriel33

I literally said the opposite.

archgabriel33

Of course not, but neither are they in their tens of thousands.

archgabriel33

They ended up in Israel after they were kicked out of their countries for being Jewish.

Most are still living there. The population of the land went from 2 million to 20 million in just 70 years.

archgabriel33

Read up on the Partition of India or on the East Pakistan genocide. Or the Romania-Bulgaria Dobruja forced ethnic exchanges. Or the ethnic cleansing of the former eastern parts of Germany post 1945. There is nothing organic and natural about these countries.

archgabriel33

So you know how India, Pakistan, Bangladesh became countries? Or what's going on in Malaysia with Rohingya, China with Uyghurs, Sudan with the people of Darfur? Do you know what was the basis of the unification of many European countries, such as Germany, Italy, Romania? Please explain how they're not ethno-states.

archgabriel33

The West Bank is not in Israel and the inhabitants aren't citizens of Israel. That's like saying America is an apartheid state for not giving equal rights to Canadians.

archgabriel33

"Apartheid" except every citizen has equal rights.

archgabriel33

Most countries in the world are ethnic states. India, China, Pakistan are famous examples of ethno-states.

archgabriel33

It's not. It's killing terrorists. Hamas had 80,000 combatants when the war started. Now it's less than a quarter of that.

archgabriel33

MX Player. Been using it for over 12 years.

archgabriel33

Ah, yes, they want to kill them due to their humane and genuine concerns for the Palestinians... Sure... Are you for real, mate?

archgabriel33

Jews and gays apparently. Again, very unsurprising.

archgabriel33

One of the protests is peaceful and full of older people, the other is not and full of passionate/angry/shouty young people. It's not difficult to guess which one is more likely to assault police officers. Nothing to do with bigotry or race.

archgabriel33

Intersectionality has ruined so many people's critical thinking faculties.

archgabriel33

It's worth bearing in mind that the 33,000 number comes from Hamas and they count themselves as civilians too.

archgabriel33

History and conflict are usually about territorial gains. This isn't. Here you've got one side trying to kill Jews and one side trying to make sure the other side can't kill Jews. It's a silly racial and religious conflict.

archgabriel33

It doesn't make sense if the conflict is silly.