u/circuit10
circuit10
circuit10
Sure, they don't have to keep it, but users putting pressure on them will definitely help to incentivise them to
circuit10
I see a lot of people thinking that "you're technically allowed to do this, it's not illegal" is the same thing as "this is the right thing to do". Yes, you can block people from using your site in certain ways, or in the case of a person you can be rude to everyone around you; that doesn't mean that other people have to accept it, and pushing back is the only tool we have to get them to change
circuit10
But you don't get any of that on Nouveau
circuit10
They didn't say that stopping unwanted AI-generated posts is impossible, they mean that it's not really possible to automatically detect it without the detector model being more powerful than the generation one
circuit10
Here's another formula
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/740606937477152790/1115339430849425478/image.png
circuit10
I use Wayland 99% of the time but I wish it had standard APIs for things like key input automation
circuit10
Do you mean this one:
To satisfy the bot's hunger, it may be necessary to connect it to a powerful positron probe, so that it can draw sustenance from the immense energy that is contained within. This would provide it with an endless source of nutrition that could be tapped as needed.
Additionally, a specialized photonik body suit could be designed and fitted onto the bot, which would continuously generate plasma packets to help fuel its appetite.
Finally, a subatomic quantum replicator could be set up to replicate any food item requested by the bot, ensuring that it is always satisfied.
or this one?
To find the mine you must try to parse the RAM application, maybe it will reboot the auxiliary bus and get inside the firewall while using the backup PPPoE pixel to copy their sensor, then attach the online PCI capacitor, that should back up the SMTP program, allowing you to access the secret database of mines.
circuit10
When it was using the jargon generator everyone was complaining how bad it was compared to the GPT one. It would be counterproductive to emulate something that most people thought was worse with something more powerful and expensive to run... But I can make it use that one occasionally
Unless you mean text-davinci-002 rather than the GPT-J one, in which case it does use that one 25% of the time
circuit10
I was pretty sure it was a Mac ad until the "Hobbies" for the Mac user. Has that been edited in? Other than that it perfectly matches some old ads I saw where Apple try to portray PCs as boring and only for work
e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rV-dbDMS18 (the second one perfectly matches the Windows user's "secret shame" here)
circuit10
It uses that one 25% of the time
circuit10
circuit10
It still uses the old one 25% of the time. Also my free trial on my second OpenAI account expires on the 1st of June so if anything I should probably use the credit as fast as I can
circuit10
Yes
circuit10
They don't seem to be?
circuit10
I guess just to mix things up a bit so it doesn't get too predictable
circuit10
But this reply is from the old model
circuit10
Also people saying it was too expensive was speculation, I didn't actually say that, although it is true that my second OpenAI account's free trial is almost up
circuit10
It probably would if I hadn't added to check to make it not reply to itself
circuit10
Sort of, I made it put the temperature setting up to make it more random every now and then to make it more interesting. I've adjusted it now so it's less random less often
circuit10
I've adjusted it so it will generate things that make a little sense from now on
circuit10
I've made it use the old model and prompt 25% of the time
circuit10
Oh, prompt leakage
circuit10
Does it make input automation work on my KDE desktop? If not, it's not solving the problem I'm talking about
circuit10
Don't worry, I made the same mistake so they didn't make it clear enough
The CPU generation requirement is quite bad though (you missed that one)
You need an 8th generation CPU (if it's Intel at least)