u/constant_void

yeah this is awful

"Press X to doubt"

Rupert: X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

Or, one reason why you can't produce any stats is because there aren't many. I do believe there are cases where RUST is on par, or faster, but in general...doesn't not appear to be that way.

My 15% assertion is algorithmic specific - below seems unbiased to me, consider memory and CPU as key indicators:

https://programming-language-benchmarks.vercel.app/rust-vs-zig

below may be a bit more biased:

https://zackoverflow.dev/writing/unsafe-rust-vs-zig/

​

re Linux: so, none.

re embedded: like I said, incomplete (as the rust page itself says -- "we quickly ended up with a fast and robust -->demonstrator<--", " Rust is a promising language and we’re excited to use it for our -->future<--". Re Volvo - "Q: Was anything lacking for you? Did you need anything from the Open Source community or did you develop it all by yourselves? Volvo: No, we did not have everything. Some parts were missing."

This isn't to say RUST won't get there one day - any platform given time and funding, can be made to do anything. However, to the OP, to says it is ready? No. It is not ready. There is no shame in admitting this; admitting where something is weak is important to making something strong. Pretending it is good enough ... well ... that is a problem.

sad to say, stay away from pottery barn unless the sofa you want is in the store.

unless they turn around customer service ... they are in the never again category.

these folks aren't paid, it's legit IMO. It's only because of all the negativity they feel compelled to post--I know, because I am one! If smarter people then I were reading the show, I think it would be better for me. Criticism is fair however negativity is 100% unproductive for reader & writer alike.