u/err0rz

OP is playing scout.
It’s one click for them.

They work fine if you use them right.

Read the documentation and set them up as designed, not in some reinvention of the wheel.

Dating in NATO?

So much this.

The £5 a month for Wikipedia is the very best money I spend.

Proud donor for 10+ years!

Already did.

I’m an IT consultant who works maybe 8 hours a week to be in the top 10% of salaries in the UK. Often deploy Agentic AI toolchains among other cursed and evil things.

My clients include defence, government and financial institutions.

I get free time, security and decent income in exchange for the damnation of my immortal soul and my karma being pitch black.

lol imagine thinking WoW wasn’t a derivative mmo the day it came out

It isn’t, we already know reality.

Funny how only trolls like you are still downvoting comments on this removed post, did this get crossposted into some incel community?

Already explained.

You not understanding and me not making sense are not the same thing.

It’s misinformation pushing a false narrative that women experience disproportionate opportunities at the expense of men.

This fiction aims to undermine feminism and the underlying aims of DEI.

If it was real, it wouldn’t be.

But it isn’t, which means it’s yet more anti-DEI rhetoric complaining about a problem which doesn’t exist.

If you have to lie to make your point, you don’t have a point.

Absolutely no company ever sent this email.

Why is this misogynistic fake post on antiwork lol

Edit: wow the bots and misogynists out in force on this one. Funny how all these “experienced professionals” are using throwaways.

While I appreciate the disclosure, ai generated posts are not permitted.

Oh I don’t doubt that it’s not a good thing, but as you’ve probably seen agentic development is very much the norm at this point with no indication this is changing.

The debugging and researching you now have more time for because the writing code part is done for you, this is the main argument in “support”. (lol more time for devs to do the stuff they hate and less time to do the stuff we love).

To be honest I think the biggest problem is that now we move too fast. You can take a feature from idea to prod in a week, where it would have taken a month before. Seems to mean a lot more features get shipped, but I’m not sure customers actually want them.

Clients used to really think about the value of a feature when they knew it would take time to ship, now we just ship things without stopping to think if we actually should.

Not really no.

The solution is designed beforehand, HLA and Architecture has some creativity to it, but the actual process of writing the code? Absolutely not.

Respectfully, sounds like you don’t work in the industry or have any experience writing production code.

Because I’m a professional IT consultant and I’ve been writing code for decades. It simply isn’t.

That’s like saying differential equations are creative or expressive. They aren’t.

Yeah it’s picky. If you type in markdown while you’re writing a description, it will understand and convert it into Jira formatting, but if you paste it in it won’t work.

It does?

Oh yeah totally, in Seed she’s all about peace then in Destiny she becomes a war leader.
Her personally totally changes with very dubious explanations and justification.

Eve Online

Excuse you, hate on Seed all you want, but leave Queen Lacus out of it.
She’s the only redeeming factor in the show! (Until they totally obliterate her in Destiny)

SLEGGAR THE GOAT

(It makes me so fucking mad he dies so fast)

Meanwhile, real tech stocks with actual value continue their run.

Team $TEAM lets fucking go

Sprite and Aroe both have a ton of good pieces! Both local artists.

they aren’t equal.

(This is gunna sound like a techbro pro-ai rant and I promise you it isn’t. If I could wave a wand and destroy LLM’s I’d wave it in a heartbeat.)

Generative AI is destroying industries and peoples lives. It’s is built on institutional theft. Using AI to generate images, video, text, music etc is an affront to human creativity and the most dystopian shit imaginable.

Writing software isn’t creative or expressive, not even the most job obsessed dev would compare their code to art or expression unironically.

Agentic software development has already become the backbone of almost all software, the overwhelming majority of engineers use claude as part of their toolchain. Regardless of if you like it, this part of AI is here to stay and the majority of software you use is already built this way. It’s also not costing anyone their jobs. Agentic development is carried out by developers and there’s no current version of the roadmap which implies this will change.
Further to this, tool assisted software development is far from new. It’s changed drastically over the past 18 months, but we’ve already been using tools to make coding less labour intensive for a long time.

It’s important to differentiate this from vibe coding (which sucks), vibe coding results in unstable and non scalable codebase whereas agentic development when properly used and configured produces code which is the same quality as human written.
Vibe coding is the real problem, and this is what puts engineers jobs at risk.
The other highly at-risk industry is software testing. AI is fairly good at this and on the present trajectory the discipline will be largely redundant in coming years.
I don’t see anyone witch-hunting AI testing. (Focus some energy here pls)

Indie devs who wish to have an even playing field with major software houses and game studios absolutely must embrace these tools and it’s important we don’t witch hunt them for it.

Steam AI disclosure is a good example, everything is using a Claude agent at some point in the toolchain but an indie is more likely to declare it. Both are indistinguishable to the end user. I can’t stress enough that you as a gamer will never be able to tell from the finished product if Claude wrote some/most of the code.

This is wildly different from generative AI being used to replace creatives, where it’s blatantly obvious.

Blame buggy games on AI testing, not AI code, humans write buggy code too.

We must embrace nuance otherwise we end up witch hunting honesty, not AI usage.

Ciri has not undertaken the trial though.

We can assume that happens between w3 and w4.

If anything this supports the argument that it’s down to mutations from the Trial of the Grasses.

Teaching signs to a non-Witcher is never explored in the books, but I don’t think it would work for three reasons.

1. Without the Trial of the Grasses you don’t have the ability to cast them (assumed)

2. Witchers protect their secrets from the outside world, they don’t even teach their sword styles to non witchers, why would they teach signs? They don’t even share the locations of their schools.

3. Trust. Even if the above two weren’t the case, the overwhelming majority of people don’t trust Witchers at all, and I’d be surprised if you could find somebody willing to go through this level of training at a Witcher school.