u/nath1234

Maybe you can chip in so the rest of us don't have to find Labor's misuse of funding for their pet project rorts.. $6m for a golf course when the public schools have to do sausage sizzles to fund smart boards is fucked up priorities and misuse of funds.

Or Matthew Knott is milking this for his third rage bait, hit piece post..

Oh hum, a 1month old account here to talk about how outrageous adding a "the" when for most of the time in the last day 50 years the media has used that term. Suddenly brought up by a bunch of accounts out of the blue.

Here's a quick one: can you link to the video you are referring to? This outrageous use of "the" that in the last week we have heard so many new accounts talking about..

Where is your outrage for the $2.7B that those fuel supply deals give Russia because we have pathetic sanctions that don't stop us funding Russia.

This appears to be one of your two whole contributions on Reddit. What specifically spurred this sudden outpouring of effort on this topic? What specifically has been patronising or delusional?

Silly to think that consequences and accountability would be inherited - just the looted stuff, money and the title.

Socialise the harm, royally hoard the benefits.

Worth noting that the Queen, in her lifetime of self-service, exempted herself and her family from any law she could. Probably couldn't be prosecuted under genocide laws in the UK either.

E.g.:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jul/14/queen-immunity-british-laws-private-property

On the issue of racism, the core of why genocides (plural) against non white local people in so many countries were carried out for king and country: the concept of "royal blood" is a manifestation of racial supremecy, after all, which might be why the Queen didn't want ethnic minorities around her pure white family too, and exempted herself and heirs from racial discrimination laws https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jun/02/buckingham-palace-banned-ethnic-minorities-from-office-roles-papers-reveal

The Queen’s courtiers banned “coloured immigrants or foreigners” from serving in clerical roles in the royal household until at least the late 1960s, according to newly discovered documents that will reignite the debate over the British royal family and race.

The documents also shed light on how Buckingham Palace negotiated controversial clauses – that remain in place to this day – exempting the Queen and her household from laws that prevent race and sex discrimination.

You aren't thinking cuntishly enough. Real estate agents are fluent in cuntish.

AI data centres are not comparable to traditional data centres.

In Australia they use about 5% today.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-26/data-centre-electricity-grid-demand/104140808

Some forecasts say will grow to use 15% of the grid generation.

That is not trivial. And it is NOT a good pairing with renewables in this country because it is 24/7 baseload demand and will push up demand outside solar generation peaks.

Qld - there was one this week saying 20%. Very much not trivial.

The USA has seen dramatic increase in emissions from AI data centres, including just one massive Amazon AI data centre set to be the biggest single polluter in the country. They have caused a shortage of gas turbines they are using so many and so much gas (which is incredibly bad as gas - with fugitive emissions released during every part of extraction, transport, storage and use - is many multiples of the greenhouse impact compared to CO2, which it also emits..)

Then there is the water usage. The e-waste (these GPUs are churning and obsolete in a far quicker cycle than regular depreciation of regular IT infrastructure). https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2024-10-29/generative-ai-generating-millions-tonnes-electronic-waste-data/104514376

And if you think it won't use lots of water, well the closed loop options involving "forever chemicals" are resulting in a ramp up of the manufacture of PFAS: https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/science/ai-boom-driving-forever-chemicals-production-report/story

Article mentions AIJAC and the Zionist Council of NSW.

Is your claim that these groups have nothing to do with Australian politics? On what grounds?

E.g.

https://aijac.org.au/about-aijac/

AIJAC conveys the interests of the Australian Jewish community to government, media and other community organisations.

AIJAC endeavours to highlight and counteract instances of anti-Israel bias and misinformation in the Australian media and wider public debate.

AIJAC’s Rambam Israel Fellowship program annually sponsors visits to Israel by selected senior journalists, politicians, political advisers, senior public servants and student leaders;

You're the one breaking sub rules and pursuing attacks rather than good faith discussion. An article that is about a very political topic, involving political lobbying groups inviting IDF soldiers here - a topic so political that even the mention of IDF in some subs means the topic would be locked or censured. The role of IDF in carrying out a genoc*de (word that is so political it means comments disappear into oblivion) is why the UN expert cited in the article has said IDF here should be investigated for any possible role in those most serious of crimes we have on the books.

Given the seriousness of the crimes being committed by the IDF, is the AFP going to investigate them do you think? Seems like whenever they are asked about such things by the Greens senators they seem to play a bit dumb about the whole thing.. and the refusal of the government to use the G word despite all the UN evidence and ICC/ICJ stuff, scholars/experts and human rights organisations.. still running cover for it.

Well, if there is a chance to discuss important things like this: take it.

An Australian was killed trying to help people being genocided to bits and paid the heaviest price. Our leadership have said they are gravely concerned but they have been completely stonewalled by our supposedly close ally.

They also appear to have committed piracy and used sexual violence against other Australians who were attempting to deliver aid by the flotilla and despite these allegations and the UN finding genocide has occurred - our government and AFP has to date not taken the slightest bit of legal action against those who advocated for or participated in the genocide. There are people who served in the IDF watering around, living in or visiting our country that should be assumed participants in that and investigated. Instead they play dumb and carefully avoid saying a genocide is a genocide.

The regime and supremacist ideology that drives this gets to do it because of censorship and propaganda.. so if there is a chance to speak up: take it.

Groups that advocate for bombing hospitals should be ineligible to own firearms. And they are loudly calling for this after advocating for gen ocide.. Pretty disgusting really.

Broken, exactly as intended.

Why does anyone care about slurs against a state?

Particularly one that has carried out ge nocide.

Australia.

Yeah, because punching down on marginalised people pretending there is no problem (despite being overrepresented in jail) makes you a real fucking hero.

Happy to be downvoted by racists.

And no doubt this fairly new account, mysteriously here to post about this topic, yet a pro-Israel user posting this stuff will count as cases of antisemitism when they are clearly posting to troll.

No, no they haven't. Nowhere in the USA has regulation approaching any sort of sane level and even if one state did, the next state over would be a free for all.

And 77% of the guns used in mass shootings are legally acquired. So the opposite of what you said.

Of the known mass shooting cases (32.5% of cases could not be confirmed), 77% of those who engaged in mass shootings purchased at least some of their guns legally, while illegal purchases were made by 13% of those committing mass shootings. In cases involving K-12 school shootings, over 80% of individuals who engaged in shootings stole guns from family members.

Via https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/public-mass-shootings-database-amasses-details-half-century-us-mass-shootings

I dunno whether Fukushima is the appropriate level of "jankiness"/"jerry rigged" that we have seen from AI data centre companies.. Maybe more Soviet era: Chernobyl perhaps.

I mean they are on record running in tents FFS: https://www.techtimes.com/articles/317862/20260605/meta-builds-ai-data-centers-tents-strategy-halves-build-time-amid-145-billion-bet.htm

And have illegally installed gas turbines: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/15/elon-musk-xai-datacenter-memphis

And have just helped themselves to water illegally: https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/georgia-data-center-used-29-million-gallons-of-water

That would be

chef's kiss

Yet compared to your post - I've somehow made a magnitude more meaningful contribution to the topic by at least trying to cite examples, which is kinda sad for you two.

You could have posted "I won't accept criticism of Labor" and been more concise.

Yet I referenced various policy areas, I've asked you to clarify and instead you add more nothing to the conversation.

Do you have anything useful to actually add? Are you disputing anything specific I referenced. Or just want to put your feelpinion that anything you disagree with is invented or fantasy.. but you can't be more specific than that?

Thanks for adding nothing but personal attacks to the conversation. Do you want references to these policy areas where Albanese is recorded as ruling them out?

Might just something you might not have paid attention to or haven't got awareness of, but you seem like you think you must have perfect awareness, so feel you can just ad hominem in lieu of an actual argument supporting your position..

Perhaps that critical thinking is something you might have missed?

Her fundamental problem is she thinks Israel is not doing something truly extraordinarily evil to the Palestinians. The truth makes it look bad because it is bad: war crimes, systemic rape/abuse/torture, deliberately targeting children, crimes against humanity and genocide are truly evil things that there is a mountain of evidence has been carried out by Israel or its proxies (extremist settlers). It is an ethnostate and has a core misconception about human rights at its core.

I imagine that, like when she publicly stated that bombing hospitals were fair game (not Israeli hospitals mind you, only ones with the "others" in the apartheid racist scheme of things), because she is complicit in advocating for genocide by denying it is happening, she wouldn't want to admit it is a genocide.. Like the Australian government who skirt around the issue because they are ignoring the ICC/ICJ and UN findings and directives to do everything possible to prevent it.

If the royal commission was anything approaching objective there might have been some examination of the appalling double standards and racist supremacism that is at the core of the RWNJ pro-Israeli mob that gets hundreds of millions of tax funding (more than any other far more discriminated/threatened demographic says the analysis)

Original link (paywalled): The golf course in the middle of Sydney’s data centre land rush - https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-golf-course-in-the-middle-of-sydney-s-data-centre-land-rush-20260706-p60cyn.html