u/pancakes1271

Hello, based department

Not everywhere, only in the

D E S I G N A T E D

S H I T T I N G

S T R E E T S

Imagine still saying that getting rid of Moyes was a good decision as we stare relegation in the face.

I work in a psychiatric hospital with people with acute psychosis, and you people are more deluded than them.

I just think it's impressive that after all these years he can still keep outdoing himself when it comes to being incoherent, crazy and stupid. I guess thats the progressive nature of dementia.

Also a traitor. And a criminal.

I think it's the other way around. Nobody who has reasonable priorities in life would waste their time moderating an internet forum for no pay. You pretty much have to be an insane person/massive loser to become one in the first place.

Seems mad for a party to win a seat with 29%. What is the lowest ever?

Mate its 2023, every political thing I dislike is fascist.

Interesting to see an article like this in a conservative publication.

Chicanery

Boris is the Jimmy McGill of politics I suppose.

Puerto Rican hooa

literally

Violence against anyone is simply never acceptable

To me the question is, how do we define violence? After all, a UN report attributed over 100,000 deaths in this country to austerity (Source). Is that acceptable to you? Is that violence? A few days ago on here I saw an article about millenials who would like children but cannot have them because they cannot afford them. If somebody was to mutilate a single person's genitals, and render them infertile, then they would be seen as a crazed psychopath and imprisoned for decades. However, achieving essentially the same outcome, but for thousands of people is completely fine and dandy as long as you do so indirectly through economic and social policy.

I suppose the point I'm making is that the whole "violence is always wrong" and "violence against political opponents is always wrong" is a bit myopic and lacks a full consideration of what we truly consider to be violence. At the end of the day, David Arness is complicit in inflicting orders of magnitude more pain, suffering and death than was inflicted upon him in this stabbing. The question is, is that morally acceptable, and not considered to be violence, because he did so indirectly, through political and economic institutions, and not directly himself?

Hopefully I don't get banned for this. I am merely posing what I consider to be an interesting quesiton of moral and political philosophy, not advocating murdering MPs.

Nah he was pretty cringe, Limpwurt is a Chad turbo-autist

So, Zalcano?

Wait, they can be lewd pics of Zalcano, that she would otherwise put on her onlyfans

The only thing I love more than that smug anime girl's face is the context of it's orignal use.

This sub doesn't consider all of them interesting, only ones that make liberals feel good.