u/reebs12

3,976 post karma · 946 comment karma · joined Feb 2017

  1. 11points

    Blender Physics vs Reality (youtu.be) [Simulation]

    3 comments · source

  2. 23points

    Basic Unix Tools - Vim (youtu.be)

    14 comments · source

  3. 0points

    Vim basics in under 2 min (youtu.be)

    1 comments · source

  4. 1points

    Vim basics in under 2 min (self.learnprogramming)

    1 comments

  5. 3points

    Basic Unix Tools - The C compiler (self.cprogramming)

    5 comments

  6. 2points

    Basic Unix Tools - The C compiler (self.C_Programming) [Removed]

    3 comments

  7. 9points

    Harlem Pigs #1 (youtu.be) [♥]

    0 comments · source

  8. 0points

    Basic Unix Tools - The C compiler (youtu.be)

    0 comments · source

  9. 9points

    Basic Unix Tools - The C compiler (youtu.be)

    0 comments · source

  10. 0points

    TimeGravel - Ice on Coffee (youtu.be)

    1 comments · source

  11. 1points

    TimeGravel - Ice on Coffee [1:33] (youtu.be) [OC]

    0 comments · source

  12. 1points

    TimeGravel - Ice on Coffee (youtu.be)

    0 comments · source

  13. 0points

    Basic Unix Tools - ls (self.learnprogramming)

    0 comments

  14. 10points

    Basic Unix Tools - ls (youtu.be)

    1 comments · source

  15. 1points

    Unix Basic Tools - ls (youtu.be)

    0 comments · source

  16. 0points

    Basic Unix Tools - ls (youtu.be)

    1 comments · source

  17. 1points

    Basic Unix Tools - ls (youtu.be)

    0 comments · source

reebs12

Thanks!

reebs12

Im very confused Is there a need or demand for free videos on basic unix tools in 2020?

If we get to 2120 and Unix-like systems are still used, I can imagine there will still be a demand for free videos on basic unix tools.

​

Can you OP describe why, as you start saying in 0:31, its not the most correct description?

Can you please describe what exactly did you not understand?

reebs12

Yes, but it is still the standard required by the current iteration of POSIX

https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html

They say:

This utility's name is tied to the current revision of the ISO C standard at the time this standard is approved. Since the ISO C standard and this standard are maintained by different organizations on different schedules, we cannot predict what the compiler will be named in the next version of the standard.

reebs12

Wonderful!

reebs12

Thanks for the constructive criticism!

reebs12

Sorry,

even though the above video is also my work, I wanted to upload this one instead https://youtu.be/vMgk0lpKl4M

reebs12

Thank you!

reebs12

Thanks!