u/spectre_theory

Your aggressive comments don't suggest that you're the best driver tbh

How insensitive.

test

Yep. You're one of the best trolls from what I see. Kudos.

score is game over after you suffered sudden death. lol.. I've collected a year long supply in lmaos from this thread. thanks

I think the only fallacy is you thinking it makes your wrong statement correct to point this out. How ironic LOL

Ouch , the score is at "double fault" methinks.

You didn't answer how it makes the person wrong. LOL

Because it's an appeal to authority fallacy bro, lol.

So that makes their statement wrong? LOL. I think we've gone from check mate to you scoring an own goal. LMAO

You didn't answer how it makes the person wrong. LOL

whatever the score was, I think that makes it check mate now. GG.

LOL'd again.

Still one more question. What about someone saying they have learned this in university makes their statement wrong? That's the one thing that kept me up last night and I like riddles. LMAO

LOL

LOL yeah I'm having a blast at how defensive you got. LOL'd

I'm done with this. No, it's not. How about you provide an argument to the contrary since this whole time you've been bemoaning everyone else's arguments while providing none of your own.

You are 100% wrong lol. Math is very scientific.

• a programming grease monkey who doesn't know what math is, August 2018

LOL

That's not an argument

I never said it was an argument, genius. I was just giving you a link to scientific math papers. Herp Derp.

This doesn't even make sense, z isn't the result of a and b, it's not the function z = f(a,b) = a + bi. Since he has conveniently started his sentence with "the complex number z,"

It makes perfect sense, because that's how it reads.

The full sentence:

So, a complex number z = a + biz=a+bi consists of two parts, one real part \operatorname{Re}(z) = aRe(z)=a and one imaginary part \operatorname{Im}(z) = bIm(z)=b.

Are you having trouble reading? It quite literally says consisting of two parts.

I also never said it was the result of a and b. That's something you made up. I specifically said it was the result of the two equations he listed. Stop distorting my words.

getting defensive much

If you continue to distort my words, I'm not going to continue this discussion with you.

oh lol you bit hard rofl

What the fuck even is a scientific math paper? Provide an example.

Go take a look for yourself: https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/science_and_mathematics

I mean just google this, there are hundreds of thousands of results lolz.

What is ambiguous about this? What could it mean other than the obvious z is the complex number with real part a and imaginary part b?

He says "a complex number z =". But it's actually the result of the equations he listed, that is assigned to z.

MUAHAHAHA THIS IS GETTING BETTER AND BETTER LOLOL. that's what happens when a programming grease monkey tries to do math. Roflmao

Maybe you're thinking of peer reviewed journals, but math and science are fundamentally different subjects. Science seeks to learn about the real universe around us. Math has no concern for such things and is purely constructed from logic to learn about logical structures.

Dude, scientific math papers exist. Get over yourself. Holy shit lmao.

And the wording in that textbook is much different than the OP's. I already went over this shit with another user.

read you already got served. 3-0

Well, if you actually did your research you would find that opinion on appeal to authority is divided, and not so clean cut as you make it seem.

No it isn't. If you claim your argument is right just because of your education, is not an argument. It's really that simple

Nice strawman. You've just demonstrated a strawman fallacy there.

"scientific math papers" don't exist.

Oh really? This is demonstrably false. I stopped reading there. Thank goodness too.

LOL 8-0. Also formula is quite a vague term and not rigorously defined. I live reddit because people from all areas of society can comment. Even people without education like yourself.

He's not appealing to authority, he has authority. He has actually studied math

When someone says they are right because they are a math and physics graduate, then that person has committed an appeal to authority fallacy.

And that kind of wording/notation is not standard at all, hence it's not found in scientific math papers (it's far too ambiguous). Herp a Derp.

You are wrong not only once, but twice :O

No, you are, 6-0.

You don't even know what you are talking any do you? I LOL'd. 5-0 to me.

Funny how you conveniently didn't quote where he said he's a physics graduate as well.

LOL I believe you are talking about a different guy. you're getting quite defensive there. losing track of how many people you cyber bully. LOL 4-0

I troll'd.

I know. LOL 8-0 to me.

That's why he said "i'm a math and physics graduate".

He said

I did a math degree, that terminology is very standard and everyone knows what it means.

You don't even know what you are talking any do you? I LOL'd. 5-0 to me.

Being dismissive of an article on the basis of your own lack of education is bullying, yes.

Nope. He called you out and clarified based on knowledge. You don't know what formula means and weren't making sense.

Nice attempt of sealioning. Stop bullying people.

If you are that sensible you should maybe stay away from the internet.

Nah, I just love calling people out for being rude and spewing bully like behavior.

You mean like this bullying here?

https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/9aha6g/z/e4vfm6j

Just what this world needs more fucking ambiguity in programming articles. Truly pathetic

Oh wait, you're that bully. Let OP write his stuff in peace you creep.

And why should anyone believe you? When I have the choice between someone with a background in math vs. a guy who goes by the name of "MyPostsAreRetarded" and where I'm struggling to find a single insightful contribution while showing this kind of behavior it really isn't difficult to pick.

I've noticed that you weren't able to provide the source, so are you retracting the claim?