u/AllowFreeSpeech

This. Who guarantees that the crypto is redeemable for fiat? Who guarantees that the crypto coin doesn't go bust? With true Monero its price is faith based. With stablecoin, a DAI-like protocol could be used.

CakeWallet via swap

We do, but for now we have to content with using gift cards, e.g. Amazon gift cards, etc. bought using Monero.

The interest of your clientele in paying with Monero would depend on the nature of your business.

The legal 18+ variant, that is. Not the darknet kind. And not in a jurisdiction where an ID check is mandated. It may still raise questions about the illegal kind.

There are some non-KYC CEX, mostly for trading, although they typically would not have Monero. Also there are various wallet apps that facilitate swaps, including for Monero. The Monero ecosystem has its own ways of acquiring Monero in exchange for other cryptos. As for exiting it, one can sell Monero to buy gift cards or other cryptos.

The only thing that one should do on a KYC CEX is buy stablecoin and withdraw it immediately. Do not deposit anything and do not transact in Monero on KYC CEX. Do not trade on a KYC CEX either.

Give it real money, only what you can afford to lose. Put your money where your mouth is.

Give it real money, only what you can afford to lose, because you probably will.

This bothered me, so I looked into it. The initial seed of Math.random uses OS randomness, and the subsequent random generations are pseudorandom. As such, it sits in the middle between time-based reproducible seeding and true OS randomness via crypto.getRandomValues. If one has enough random samples, one may be able to determine the internal state of Math.random and thereby the future samples.

I clocked 6.1-Sol at 43 output tokens/second a few days ago. I used robust sqrt(length*duration) weighting, and ensured that the mean and median were close. This is with regular mode, not fast mode. I haven't tried yesterday.

Sodium alginate raises my BP, presumably due to the sodium in it, so it doesn't make sense for me to use it in any raft formulation. I have tried it more than once in different homemade raft-creation formulas, and it has always had this unacceptable side effect.

He actually has strong conflicts-of-interest in his "moderation" if you could call it that. He aggressively polices posts having to do with his San Francisco friends and associates, banning anyone who makes the slightest criticism, while completely ignoring other threads where people speak freely. His behavior is no way objective. His "effort" is protecting his friends. It is clownish.

Nope. If there is one site that is worse than HN, it is lobsters. Its operator is a buffoon.

You're dead wrong. The guy has extreme conflict of interests, whereby he selectively polices specific threads having to do with his friends and associates around San Francisco, banning users there for even minor slights, while completely ignoring other threads where people speak freely without issue. It is clownish.

It had been working fine for years in long chats, then now it happened. Sometimes there is no way to briefly summarize a long chat because there is just too much relevant context spread throughout the chat. There is nothing wrong with the chat length since it's within the supported context length of the model. I am not holding it wrong.

Your concern is serious. Email support. Ensure your bank account is unchanged. Make sure the money has settled.

There is not a lot to it, so I would be surprised if there were any significant bugs. Across various products, bugs these days are more a result of unreviewed vibecoding, but surely I hope Alpaca isn't doing that.

Can't you use paper account key for market data?

In fact it's implemented in the best possible way, not in a convoluted way.

What precisely are you afraid of?

I see it in mine. It looks optional for now. It should be good for users who need to execute multiple strategies. It would make sense for each subaccount to have its own key.

I am using Firefox. Yesterday I had updated to v157.

Do you have any evidence for this having to do with any adblocker, or are you just guessing? There is no reason for an adblocker to make a recent response disappear in a chat. All I did yesterday is update my browser to the latest version, but I have done this almost every week for years.