u/AllowFreeSpeech

No, I have no affiliation whatsoever. I only use it as a random user. The only FUD I see is in the post claiming malware without evidence.

There is a random screenshot. It doesn't establish a chain of evidence. There is no mention of the specific Archive link. There is no capture of its source code or its screenshot. What you point to doesn't prove anything.

I am hitting your nerves now. You are starting to see the wrongdoing in your illogic. This is why you want me to stop. It's getting uncomfortable for you.

For the sake of argument, imagine you were claiming a UFO, then assert that every post that rejects UFOs will henceforth be disallowed. Imagine you fail to provide any evidence of the said UFO. Would you just want people to take your word for the UFO? Should a random screenshot of a different UFO taken from the internet suffice?

You clearly have issues with basic epistemology. Just because I don't believe something doesn't mean I assert its opposite. Given the absence of evidence, I have the right to withhold an opinion on the matter.

I never called you a liar. You just haven't presented any evidence. I am a long-time Reddit user. If I was making the claim, I would've shared the archive link in question, its HTML source, its screenshot, etc.

So it's someone's unqualified assertion. Got it. Believe it or not, the subreddit mods are already acting as infosec personnel since they have have allegedly taken the liberty to evaluate what they say happened. It's not hard to share the evidence chain, but for some strange reason you refuse to do so. If I was making the claim, I would've shared the archive link in question, its HTML source, its screenshot, etc.

Why don't you respond more rationally to the question? Lots of users have asked you for evidence and you have failed to produce the evidence chain, downvoting them instead. You shared one screenshot of some page which doesn't prove anything. Why is this an unreasonable request? I am guessing you don't have any.

Exactly. No evidence was shared, and the author wants us to take his word for it.

Huh. It is not unreasonable to seek evidence. Not everything can be taken at face value.

I see zero evidence. I have no reason to believe it.

This. Who guarantees that the stablecoin crypto is redeemable for fiat? Who guarantees that it doesn't go bust? With true Monero, its price is faith based. With stablecoin, a DAI-like protocol could be used.

CakeWallet via swap.

We do, but for now we have to content with using gift cards, e.g. Amazon gift cards, etc. bought using Monero.

The interest of your clientele in paying with Monero would depend on the nature of your business.

The legal 18+ variant, that is. Not the darknet kind. And not in a jurisdiction where an ID check is mandated. It may still raise questions about the illegal kind.

There are some non-KYC CEX, mostly for trading, although they typically would not have Monero. Also there are various wallet apps that facilitate swaps, including for Monero. The Monero ecosystem has its own ways of acquiring Monero in exchange for other cryptos. As for exiting it, one can sell Monero to buy gift cards or other cryptos.

The only thing that one should do on a KYC CEX is buy stablecoin and withdraw it immediately. Do not deposit anything and do not transact in Monero on KYC CEX. Do not trade on a KYC CEX either.

Give it real money, only what you can afford to lose. Put your money where your mouth is.

Give it real money, only what you can afford to lose, because you probably will.

This bothered me, so I looked into it. The initial seed of Math.random uses OS randomness, and the subsequent random generations are pseudorandom. As such, it sits in the middle between time-based reproducible seeding and true OS randomness via crypto.getRandomValues. If one has enough random samples, one may be able to determine the internal state of Math.random and thereby the future samples.

I clocked 6.1-Sol at 43 output tokens/second a few days ago. I used robust sqrt(length*duration) weighting, and ensured that the mean and median were close. This is with regular mode, not fast mode. I haven't tried yesterday.

Sodium alginate raises my BP, presumably due to the sodium in it, so it doesn't make sense for me to use it in any raft formulation. I have tried it more than once in different homemade raft-creation formulas, and it has always had this unacceptable side effect.

He actually has strong conflicts-of-interest in his "moderation" if you could call it that. He aggressively polices posts having to do with his San Francisco friends and associates, banning anyone who makes the slightest criticism, while completely ignoring other threads where people speak freely. His behavior is no way objective. His "effort" is protecting his friends. It is clownish.

Nope. If there is one site that is worse than HN, it is lobsters. Its operator is a buffoon.

You're dead wrong. The guy has extreme conflict of interests, whereby he selectively polices specific threads having to do with his friends and associates around San Francisco, banning users there for even minor slights, while completely ignoring other threads where people speak freely without issue. It is clownish.