u/explain_that_shit

615 post karma · 149.3k comment karma · joined Jun 2014

explain_that_shit

We have enough dwellings in this country, in every region and city, for its population and then surplus left over. We have enough for our homeless, we have enough for immigrants, we have enough for young people and young families. They’re being kept empty and off the market, we are not distributing them efficiently.

explain_that_shit

It all sounds so much like Sippenhaft or generational blood guilt

explain_that_shit

By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak - Ur-Fascism by Umberto Eco

explain_that_shit

Genetic studies have already zipped this one up mate, Palestinians are Canaanites, they’ve been there since day dot. They just converted to Islam and started speaking Arabic when the Arabs came to visit.

Your position is like saying the Welsh are English because they speak English and are Anglican. It’s a furphy.

explain_that_shit

If Netanyahu wins, it proves Israelis want Netanyahu’s war to continue the way it has, which ends the idea that the problem is just Netanyahu’s government.

If Eisenkot wins, he will proceed to continue Israel’s war the way Netanyahu has, which ends the idea that the problem is just Netanyahu’s government BUT does not prove that the problem is Israeli culture as a whole.

If Israelis re-elect Eisenkot or Netanyahu at the following election, that will prove the problem is at least the system of Israeli politics.

But if Eisenkot makes inconsistent moves about the war during his term, or if Likud replaces Netanyahu with someone who makes inconsistent positions about the war during Eisenkot’s term, either of them can be re-elected with Israelis still getting the benefit of the doubt globally as their culture or political system.

And so this story will proceed, until all the Palestinians are dead and dispossessed. It will all be designed to give them enough time for that.

explain_that_shit

You’re teaching a three year old farming?

explain_that_shit

Ahahahahahaha gottem

explain_that_shit

Raise land taxes. Fed government has the power to do it, and they did levy land tax for a long time.

explain_that_shit

Not if they spend money on things which increase productivity.

explain_that_shit

You don’t know how lucky you are boy

explain_that_shit

Australian income taxes are much higher than OECD average, but we are absolutely shit at taxing assets like land and resources. No one is suggesting increasing income taxes, hell they can come down. But we have got to increase our land tax and resources taxes.

explain_that_shit

Fair work act - let me know when you’ve dealt directly with the fair work commission.

And yeah businesses protect their owners’ assets from legal liability. Employees generally don’t have significant assets, they just have their salaries which are effectively massively exposed in our society.

Businesses also have the safe harbour rule, taxation avoidance structures, better access to deductibles, etc.

explain_that_shit

Because some individuals sit on monopoly rents, that’s not the exclusive preserve of huge corpos.

explain_that_shit

So there’s the value of the land/resources, and then there’s the value of the work to improve/extract it. We already know how to split these, it’s not that complicated. Something is still worth doing even if you don’t personally know how it works.

explain_that_shit

How about we don’t tax people while they’re working, and just tax them when they’re not and sitting idly on their monopoly rents?

explain_that_shit

They can keep the value of their labour but they didn’t make the value of what’s lying under our feet, that belongs to all of us.

explain_that_shit

What protections for workers? And businesses get tons of protections, including a shield from legal liability.

explain_that_shit

Workers aren’t productive?

And fine, charge it on non-productive assets like unimproved land values - there’s no deadweight loss.

explain_that_shit

Some women aren’t into tongues or toys.

EDIT: Wow, BoyDinnerDiaries users painting women as a monolith. You need more women in this sub or it’s going get cancerous here quickly.

explain_that_shit

Doesn’t the opposition believe the same thing, aren’t they planning to continue the war?

explain_that_shit

One squirt of soap for your armpits, face, then over your body but avoid your crack and front bits. Then clean that all off with water. Second squirt just for crack and front bits. All done and dusted, unless you need to do more like shave or pumice your feet or something. Also unless it’s freezing, turn off the hot water first. The cold water will cause your pores to close up which will prevent spots.

explain_that_shit

This is incidentally also why a Hail Mary threesome doesn’t solve the problem. You don’t want sex, you want your partner to want to have sex with you.

explain_that_shit

I don’t think they vote for their preferred outcome, I think they expect right wingers to succeed more than they do. Right wing gambling types are in media echo chambers and believe more conspiracy theories about stolen elections after the fact; this is a cohort that will naturally tend towards betting on their horse.

explain_that_shit

Yep, I think a fair chunk of people on this sub are right wing libertarian non-landowners who, credit to them, like the idea of low taxes on themselves, but beyond that could give maybe one shit about the policy prescription for high land tax but no shits for the expansion of the principle to taxes on rents charged by other monopolies or oligopolies.

explain_that_shit

“No no, this stone definitely has more blood in it. What do you mean, extract blood from something with blood left in it? I have blood, I’m certainly not taking blood out of me, and not my friends either!”