The Cost Of Kansas Private School Vouchers Will Likely Skyrocket And Defund Public Schools

The Kansas legislature is proposing a voucher program similar to Ohio, where a recent study showed vouchers cost the state several hundred million, much of which was delivered the state's wealthiest families.

At the same time, Ohio cut over $100 Million from public schools while spending on vouchers was expected to go up $500M.

Gov. Mike DeWine has said he would be fully funding public schools, but an analysis by the Legislative Service Commission shows a $103 million cut from traditional public schools over the two-year budget while costs for private charter schools and vouchers would go up another $500 million.

The Cost Of Kansas Private School Vouchers Will Likely Skyrocket And Defund Public Schools

115 comments · 97% upvoted · other discussions

comments

Honky_Stonk_Man

Worse, it is a system that gives credits to wealthy people who otherwise would have just paid for private schooling, only now the public is footing them bill.

twzill

So I can imagine private schools would run out of room and have build more space to handle new students which makes tuition go higher, while public schools have too much space making them inefficient and have to close.

Far-Dragonfruit3398

Thanks to Trump, the rich get a big piece of the pie and the middle class and poor have to pay for their pie and the ice cream topping.

Vio_

THAT'S THE POINT.

cyberphlash [OP]

Just another step toward the primary mission...

feastingOnyourSoul

This states perspective on choice is one big joke.

Public school children and low-income kids would be excluded from these tax credits.
If you think the schools look, feel and operate like prisons now... just wait. Elections have consequences.

weealex

It's fine, new judges will be placed to invalidate the state constitution, then it can be changed so that education is no longer a right and we can just make all the poors can be sent to the mines.

Everyone knows the children yearn for the mines

cyberphlash [OP]

I agree with your sentiment that people should experience consequences, but that's not the real problem here, which is that once you enact some big program like this, it creates a new lobby/constituency to keep it in place so you'll never get rid of it. Here, you're creating a constituency of at least tens of thousands of people who get a benefit of thousands of free dollars every year through a kid's K-12. That's a huge incentive to want to stop this from going away. And it's not GOP legislators will rush to get rid of this even if GOP voters feel some pain. Once this is enacted, it's probably gonna be in place probably permanently.

Devbrostated

They don't want the masses educated. Makes them easier to control

ButtScratchies

And they don't want DEI kids to be in schools. These wealthy people at these schools will not accept poor, non-white kids or disabled kids. I think every single person in this country realizes that MAGA means going back to a time when only white, Christian men had rights. There is literally no other explanation based on his EO's.

Composed_Cicada2428

Look at the financial disaster school vouchers caused in Arizona

https://www.propublica.org/article/arizona-school-vouchers-budget-meltdown

Vox_Causa

"School Choice" has the dual goal of defunding public schools and resegregating schools. 

Cruelty is the point. 

[deleted]

[deleted]

Whore-a-bullTroll

THIS.

[deleted]

[deleted]

Whore-a-bullTroll

Hell yes! Preach, friend. I'm not going anywhere and neither should the rest of you. We stick together, we don't lose our shit, and we fight for each other. It's both the Kansas way and the American way. ❤️

[deleted]

[deleted]

Whore-a-bullTroll

Always the Free State 😁

apgren87

Thank god my kids can smell the bullshit stupid nonsense

chitphased

You got to love late stage capitalism. Smh

feastingOnyourSoul

RIGHT.

I cannot wait to be sued by the hospital right before it closes up shop!

MmmmmmmBier

Vouchers sound “great” if you live in the city, but what about the towns that only have public schools?

shoobe01

That is what they are banking on. Take the statewide tax revenue to fund a handful of private schools for the new right wing elite, exclusively.

None of the people proposing this live out in the little towns. See how they handled rural Kansas health care in the last 20 years as an example. Hint: they destroyed it.

georgiafinn

Ppl will have to "home school" but still have to work full time jobs, so it will be money in pocket and the kids learn from their iPads.

smr5578

It's not just if you live in cities, it's the families that are not wealthy. We are dumbing down our children at the cost of the wealthy.

OhDavidMyNacho

The regular people in the cities don't want this either. It's the "unschooling" crowd and the wealthy that benefit from this. They're the only ones that want it.

Vio_

The only ones who benefit from it most are the ones trying to profit by it by sucking up the educational funds, charging all children tuition fees, then dumping any that don't fit their most profitable/whitest/malest/able-est,etc idea of the "perfect" students.

MmmmmmmBier

I know, but there are a lot of small town “conservatives” who will go along with this just because…….

LuvinMyThuderGut

There's quite a few private schools in Wichita but it's surrounding counties have but one or two. The one private school in my county is already in a tiny town, there's no way they'll absorb all the students that did get a voucher from the other "larger" towns around it. 

 I'm just a custodian in a small school in a small town. I will have to look for a new career, I guess. It's another 5 years until I'm vested in my 403(b). 

ecplectico

That’s the MAGA plan: destroy everything.

ScootieJr

Yes republicans want the poor to die out and not be educated while they can fund the indoctrination of "Christian values" in their private schooling that only the wealthy can afford. Also, Private schools will discriminate and only allow those who can afford it and are not a minority. Vouchers don't benefit the people whose children go to a public school which is already tax payer funded. Now they're just diverting funding to private schools that already earn money and those schools will not lower costs. In fact, they will most likely increase costs knowing that the government is funding part of it. It's no different than the government providing predatory loans for college, which is one reason why universities drastically increased costs when loans were first offered. Since these vouchers aren't loans, it's a handout, it will arguably be worse.

FrancoElTanque

This is a bullshit plan from people with far from noble intentions.

AlanStanwick1986

Even conservative Texas has fought this because they know it kills their rural schools 

Valuable-Speaker-312

The people that are against loan forgiveness should be against this too - someone is using their tax dollars for education and will not be paying it back.

Sondergame

God, if only someone could have seen this coming. /s

Whore-a-bullTroll

Right? It's almost as if this all illustrated in a certain "Project" that most people in our state never bothered to read.....

Objective-Stay5305

It's a feature, not a bug. When the public school system collapses due to lack of funding, Republicans will eliminate school vouchers altogether so only the wealthy will be able to educate their children. I believe that is the end state they have in mind. The rest of your kids can work as unskilled labor in mines, mills, and slaughterhouses.

[deleted]

That's the fucking point.Very specific tailored schooling for rich kids only to brainwash them. The rest can be child labor.

[deleted]

Too bad for republicans lol

[deleted]

My child will never not know are history and I will be teaching her about physics, algebra, astronomy, the atrocious the United States government has done to are people, chemistry, sign language, English and Spanish. The mega rich and are government are making a play to keep the poor illiterate and uneducated. We're all poor. Even if you have a 3 car garage full of fancy cars. Welcome to being treated as poor

ksdanj

Same thing has happened in Arizona.

VoltCtrlOpossumlator

Private interest groups and billionaires want to funnel tax money to private schools. More Perfect Union video about Nebraska's attempt for their unpopular school voucher program.

John Oliver also touched on these (or adjacent radical groups) in the Charter Schools, Critical Race Theory, and Home School episodes.

It's all about control and legal tax theft.

Early_Awareness_5829

Combine the vouchers with removing federal funding and education will only be for the rich.

Unlikely_Ad_8330

I am also willing to bet my left nut that private schools that charge tuition will go up.

cyberphlash [OP]

Isn't private school tuition already like college tuition anyway, where most (mid-upper income) people pay full price and lower income people get some amount of discount based on income? To your point, the overall tuition goes up, but the needs-based discounts are just less and that system stays in place. It's all about maximizing revenue, baby! :)

wstdtmflms

I mean... Fine. All of the private schools are in Wichita, Salina, Topeka, Lawrence and JoCo. If western Kansans and southeastern Kansans wanna spend 6 hours a day, every day, driving their kids to school, then who are we to stop them? 🤷

Elections have consequences, so may these people ought to be allowed to feel the FO phase. Maybe we should stop trying to save these people from themselves, or helping people who don't want our help.

Disco425

Can you imagine what the next generation of "Christian Taliban" will be like, going through these schools with no accreditation or oversight to educational standards? (Remember the Department of Education will be no more.) Critical thinking skills, understanding of science and biology and appreciation for different cultures will be removed in favor of xenophobia, opposition to vaccines and creationism.

cyberphlash [OP]

Don't worry, the next step here is probably giving public school money to homeschoolers in addition to private schoolers...

Disco425

I started to laugh, like yeah right...then I thought, OMG this will happen.

Hey guess what? Jimmy got an A in "Racism and Intolerance", and Suzie got a B+ for her Soap Making project!

cyberphlash [OP]

One of my former coworkers was a big homeschooler with a couple of kids, and they went to a homeschooling conference every year and bought some (I think) fairly expensive curriculum stuff for each kid, so it's not a small amount of money to homeschool if you're trying to do a good job with it. Wouldn't surprise me at all if the legislature tried to subsidize that.

lovemymeemers

Check out what it's doing on Ohio.

Spoiler: Nothing good for anyone that didn't already have it good

brrrrrrrrrrr69

I'm coming over from KY to give y'all hope. We voted this shit down super hard: 65% against. I have faith that y'all make the same decision. Vouchers are categorically awful.

cyberphlash [OP]

We voted this shit down super hard

Kansas doesn't have public referendums where voters get to propose and vote on issues, so unless a KS Constitutional amendment is required to implement vouchers, the legislature can just pass the law itself to implement it, which is what's being proposed right now.

brrrrrrrrrrr69

I think our states have similar rules around constitutional amendments because we don't have refernda either. We only have amendments. I was mistaken of the process occurring in KS and thought it might be a proposed amendment like Amendment 2 in 2022.

Kentucky's vouchers had to be implemented via an amendment due to Section 184 which forces any non-public school funding to a vote via an amendment.

Neither-Night9370

Voucher programs shouldn't exist. It just funnels tax money into private hands and cripples the public school system. If private schools are going to receive public funds, they should be required to accept ALL students just as public schools do and required to make all the same accommodations that public schools do.

ImaginaryRepublic753

I live in Florida. We have the voucher system. The vouchers are for $7700. I have a well-regarded elementary/high school near me. It costs $45000 per student to attend.

NoSeaworthiness8393

But yet people keep voting for gop, and then wonder why their quality of life continues to decline.

FlounderFun4008

And at the same time they raise the standards and requirements for public schools for funding that they don’t place on private schools.

BartyMcFartFace

Your zip code should not determine your educational opportunities. Trapping kids in failing public schools for the sake of saving public schools is nonsense.

If public schools were so great, why would offering kids a choice do anything? They’d obviously choose the great public school, wouldn’t they?

Except they wouldn’t, because public schools have been failing for 25 years. If they need more money, maybe they can fire some administrators who get paid 6 figures a year to make education worse.

[deleted]

[removed]

thekayinkansas

Confirmed. My child goes to a different district than the one for our zip code.

ScootieJr

So you believe that people who cannot afford private schooling shouldn't be educated, thus increasing the racial and poverty gap of education. These vouchers are not going to get the poor into private schools and private schools can be discriminately selective of who attends. And you know very damn well that republicans will not ban discrimination because banning discrimination is "DEI". The voucher system will not be a 100% payment to attend these schools nor will it block discrimination of who they allow to attend. You want to reduce that poverty to wealth gap, you fund education properly, not force them to pay to be indoctrinated to some "Christian value" purpose private institute.

BartyMcFartFace

10 poor kids could take their $10k stipend and hire an educator to “home school” them. The teacher would make $80k and have $20k to supply materials.

You think this is somehow worse than failing public schools?

iheartxanadu

How is a single teacher supposed to know all the topics necessary for a well-rounded education for students from pre-K to high school education? Even if you just mean high school, the same problem will exist.

BartyMcFartFace

You think high school teachers specialize in certain subjects while in college? Their degrees are in teaching. Not math, science, history, etc.

ScootieJr

My chemistry teacher had a degree in chemistry. My calc teacher had a degree in math. One of our physics teachers had a degree in physics. So yes, there are teachers who have degrees specific to what they teach. You don’t need an education degree to teach. You need a degree to teach. And if you have a specific degree and want to teach, you will more than likely teach the subject your degree relates.

iheartxanadu

You're wrong, though. 🤷‍♀️

cyberphlash [OP]

If public schools were so great...

We should really start there, because all public schools are not great across Kansas, due to the long history of the legislature under-funding schools, particularly in areas with lots of low-income and special needs kids like KCK - which was argued in many lawsuits going back to the 90's, most recently in the lengthy Gannon series of suits, where the KS legislature was ordered by the state supreme court to properly fund schools, which it's still not complying with.

And if the state claims to not have the tens of millions of dollars required to be spent on special needs kids, how can legislators credibly argue we have the over a hundred million dollars available to spend on private schools? That only makes sense if your goal is to ultimately de-fund public schools.

Also, if you're in support of vouchers, how do you reconcile the fact that private schools now allowed to accept public money can choose to toss kids with behavior problems, or refuse to serve special needs kids? "Not our problem", they all say, leading back to the requirement that the underfunded public schools must serve these kids. There's no apples-to-apples comparison between public and private schools anyway, when private schools are full of relatively wealthy kids, and the schools can pick and choose which kids to serve or not - unlike public schools.

If you want to send public money to private schools, you should at least argue for holding the schools to the same requirements for serving all kids if they're willing to accept public dollars. I think you'll find that many private schools would then refuse to take public dollars because serving low income and special needs kids is more of a challenge than they want to take on.

BartyMcFartFace

Is your argument really that public schools don’t kick kids out for behavior issues? Ok I see we don’t occupy the same reality. You are delusional.

Also we spend more per child adj for inflation than we ever have and have less to show for it.

This is the kind of shit that makes liberals lose so god damn always.

cyberphlash [OP]

Oh yea, surely vouchers can't be that expensive... LOL

BartyMcFartFace

They were so expensive because they underestimated how many parents wanted to get their kids out of shit hole public schools.

cyberphlash [OP]

The ProPublic article points out that most of the voucher spending isn't on public school students transferring to private schools, it's from existing private school kids now getting funded by the state.

Also, this isn't doing anything to improve Arizona's overall school performance since the same kids are pretty much all in the same schools they started out in, and public school kids are still stuck in the same underperforming, underfunded, Arizona public schools because legislators were never trying to properly fund public schools to begin with - just like in Kansas.

cyberphlash [OP]

Can you help me understand why you think vouchers will actually improve overall education (among all kids) performance, and why the spending is justified.

In JoCo, we already have great public schools, and most of the private schools in the state are going to be in more urban/suburabn areas like JoCo where relatively wealthy people already live, but public / private school performance differences don't really exist, so no significant educational performance improvement created by all the voucher expense in JoCo.

In rural areas, there aren't that many private schools, and assuming vouchers existed, do you think more private schools would spring up there? I don't - so basically no educational performance improvement created by vouchers in rural areas.

I think your best bet is talking about vouchers for low-performing school districts like KCK. Certainly there's a lot of improvement potential there, but again, why do you believe a bunch of new private schools are going to spring up to take on the challenge of educating a large group of low-income students when it's known that it's harder and more costly to educate low-income students?

You have this massive multi hundred million dollar expense coming to just start paying for private school kids, with almost no actual improvement in educational achievement across the state. Why would taxpayers who don't have kids in private schools today want to take on that expense? It doesn't make sense. Is your basic argument that the state should just take on the expense of paying for every kid in public or private school without the expectation of anything changing? That's not what I'm seeing you say, or any of the voucher proponents saying, but that seems to be the general gist of it.

BartyMcFartFace

Vouchers create accountability.

If you aren’t educating, parents will take their kids elsewhere.

This is WHY people make the claim vouchers defund public schools. It’s because parents take their kids out of failing public schools.

In JoCo, this probably wouldn’t happen. If my parents had a voucher, I’d have still gone to a BV school and they would have got the same amount of money they always would.

But bad schools would be shut down. Currently, they don’t have an incentive to do anything different. The funding will always be there because it’s guaranteed from the state. It’s the definition of insanity.

Your arguments about subsidizing the wealthy can easily be solved by income limits. We do this with food stamps, and tax credits. Why can’t we do it with vouchers?

cyberphlash [OP]

I grew up Catholic and went for a time to a Catholic school, then later switched to public. IMO the reason most Catholics are paying to send their kids to Catholic schools is the pressure by the church to "educate your kids Catholic", and the perception that Catholic schools are better schools - which is probably true in some locations of low-performing public schools where the Catholic schools can refuse to serve behavior/special needs/other challenging public school kids, or quickly eject kids coming from public schools that show poor performance.

In places like this, to your point, in order to maintain the perception of a high level of private school quality, doesn't the Catholic school (in places like KCK) have every incentive to try and toss low-performing kids so the district, on paper, is always performing better than public schools? And at the same time, it's not like the Catholic church is going to build a bunch of new schools for non-Catholic kids coming from public schools in order to serve them, so how do vouchers really help people in KCK? Do you expect a bunch of new private schools to pop up in KCK looking to serve those challenging kids?

In places like JoCo, I highly doubt the Catholic schools are performing significantly better than BV/Olathe/Shawnee districts, and I'm not convinced that Catholic school parents are going to be doing the kind of comparison you're talking about, where they'd ultimately withdraw kids from Catholic schools because they think the Catholic schools are "underperforming" in some way. There's a certain status for wealthier or religious JoCo parents to send their kids to private schools - but those schools are probably already full, so do you expect more new Catholic or private schools to spring up in JoCo to compete with existing public and private schools?

So, I still don't understand how you're saying vouchers lead to an improvement in educational attainment across the board (public + private combined). That could only happen if (1) an area's private schools perform significantly better than public schools AND (2) today's private school capacity expands to open up space for public school kids to move into them. That is the only case where a voucher has created actual value in educational improvement, and since the public school will actually lose money as a result of that student leaving, it's possible that de-funding is harmful to the remaining students at that school.

Maybe you see a shift of 'normal' performing kids from poor public schools to incrementally better private schools in KCK. The remaining public schools get lower funding but still have to deal with the more challenging lower-performing, disabled, etc (ie: higher-cost) students that private schools refuse to take on - unless they're forced to take every kid that wants to go to private schools by accepting public money. But, of course, that's why this is structured as a voucher program, so GOP legislators can avoid that exact requirement.

thekayinkansas

Username checks out 🙄

Vox_Causa

Vouchers do not give families more choice in education. They do not fully fund tuition at basically any private school plus private schools do not offer transportation or free/subsidized lunch or before/after school care the way public schools do meaning that in reality vouchers are really only a tax cut for people who can already attend private school. 

What's worse is that vouchers take money away from public schools and gives it to schools that may not be acceedited and are free to exclude people based on their socio-economic status, religion, gender/orientation, or skin color.

Sqribe

My guy, with vouchers it's ASSURED that your zip code will determine education opportunities. Public schools have failed as a whole? Yeah, might as well get rid of all attempts to educate the entire populace.

Your problem, similar to how conservatives struggle, is a staggering lack of imagination. You cannot imagine it being WORSE than it already is. Don't worry, you won't have to imagine soon.

[deleted]

[removed]

[deleted]

[deleted]

BartyMcFartFace

We spend more per child adjusted for inflation than we ever have and have LESS to show for it.

Public schools are a failed experiment. Let the parents decide where their kids go. Not you!

Vox_Causa

Comments like this are why everybody says that Republicans are stupid. 

[deleted]
Vio_

Kansas has had public schools for over 150 years now- before we were even a state.

It's literally built into our state constitution to fully fund schooling for children.

It's not a "failed experiment." You just don't want an educated populace.

[deleted]

[removed]

[deleted]

[removed]

kansas-ModTeam

No name-calling, insults, or personal attacks. Be kind to each other.

[deleted]